“…Because they combine the unique properties of stable organic radicals with the versatility of conventional polymers, organic radical polymers (ORPs) have found wide application as organocatalysts, , spin probes, , organic magnetic materials, , biological imaging agents, , conductive materials, − and most prominently as the active material in organic radical batteries (ORBs) , or redox flow batteries. , The first polymer based on this concept was introduced in 1967 by Griffith et al, utilizing a polymethacrylate (PMA) backbone, which was functionalized with the stable radical (2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidin-1-yl)oxyl (TEMPO) as a pendant side group, resulting in poly(TEMPO methacrylate) (PTMA) . Due to its intrinsic radical stability, highly reversible and fast redox kinetics ( k ex ≈ 10 8 M –1 s –1 ), eligible standard potential (3.6 vs Li/Li + ), and straightforward functionalization approaches, TEMPO is the most prominent radical moiety among ORPs. ,− This has resulted in a variety of different polymer backbones functionalized with TEMPO, such as poly(ethers), , poly(methacrylates), , poly((oxo)norbornenes), − poly(styrenes), and poly(thiophenes), synthesized via techniques ranging from free radical, living radical, , ionic, − and ring-opening metathesis polymerization ,, to electropolymerization. , These approaches can be further divided into the direct polymerization of radical-containing monomers and the post-polymerization functionalization/deprotection of polymers containing suitable radical precursors/protecting groups as pendant side groups. ,, The direct polymerization route is a straightforward approach without the need for post-polymerization reactions; however, the scope of polymerization techniques is limited, and side reactions by the radicals can lower the radical concentration in the obtained ORPs. ,,− ...…”