2010
DOI: 10.3892/or_00001072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NK1.1+ cells are important for the development of protective immunity against MHC I-deficient, HPV16-associated tumours

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we did not observe significantly higher cytotoxicity of the spleen cells from the animals immunized with HHP-treated cells and this finding was in agreement with the results of immunization-challenge experiments. We did not see any significant differences between vaccination with HHP- or IR-treated tumor cells; both vaccinations inhibited TC-1 tumor growth, as expected and previously observed for the animals immunized with IR-treated cells ( 30 , 31 ) while the TRAMP-C2 tumor growth was not blocked by both of the vaccination protocols. It has been previously shown that TRAMP-C2 tumor cells are not immunogenic, unless their immunogenicity was increased by IFNγ treatment, inducing MHC class I cell surface expression ( 36 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, we did not observe significantly higher cytotoxicity of the spleen cells from the animals immunized with HHP-treated cells and this finding was in agreement with the results of immunization-challenge experiments. We did not see any significant differences between vaccination with HHP- or IR-treated tumor cells; both vaccinations inhibited TC-1 tumor growth, as expected and previously observed for the animals immunized with IR-treated cells ( 30 , 31 ) while the TRAMP-C2 tumor growth was not blocked by both of the vaccination protocols. It has been previously shown that TRAMP-C2 tumor cells are not immunogenic, unless their immunogenicity was increased by IFNγ treatment, inducing MHC class I cell surface expression ( 36 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Mice were twice immunized with 5×10 6 irradiated tumor cells in a three-week interval (s.c., irradiation dose was 150 Gy, HHP dose was 200 MPa) ( 13 , 30 , 31 ). For in vivo studies, 10 days after the second immunization, mice were challenged s.c. with corresponding tumor cells (TC-1, 5×10 4 ; TRAMP-C2, 1×10 6 cells/mouse).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The B16F10 melanoma growth was significantly impaired, and lower number of tumor foci was detected in the lung using metastatic model of melanoma in the b+d-NK1.1neg strain compared to C57BL/6. This could be attributed to the upregulation of NKG2D in the novel strains and activation of cytotoxic effector cells that restrain the tumor growth (42,43). Similar effects were observed with MCB8 fibrosarcoma syngeneic to Balb/c.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Previously, we described the participation of activated NKT cells in the control of tumor growth at the early stages (45). The results of prophylactic immunization showed the distinct role of cell subsets in the development of immunity and the important role of NK cells (43).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In the Balb-high mice, the period of tumor growth was prolonged to 20 days, similarly to the Balb/c parental strain ( 4 ). In the prophylactic immunization experimental settings using irradiated TC-1/A9 tumor cells in C57BL/6 mice, a remarkable role of NK1.1-positive cells in the development of immunity was observed ( 5 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%