1997
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.272.36.22526
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nm23/PuF Does Not Directly Stimulate Transcription through the CT Element in Vivo

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These factors also bind to the HIS4 promoter and are responsible for expression of HIS4 under limiting conditions (55). Similarly, the transcriptional activation capacity of Nm23-H2 is still a matter of controversy, and its putative function as a cofactor modifying trans-acting factors during tumor suppression has been discussed (56).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These factors also bind to the HIS4 promoter and are responsible for expression of HIS4 under limiting conditions (55). Similarly, the transcriptional activation capacity of Nm23-H2 is still a matter of controversy, and its putative function as a cofactor modifying trans-acting factors during tumor suppression has been discussed (56).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Nm23-H2 did not function as a c-myc transcription factor using multiple promoter activity constructs (Michelotti et al 1997, Chae et al 1998). …”
Section: Concernsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The arguments against this activity have been numerous and broad. Briefly, regulation of c-myc transcription by NDPK/ Nm23 was not observed using traditional promoter-driven fusion protein transcriptional assays used throughout the myc field (Michelotti et al 1997), NDPK/Nm23 was reported to bind to any single-stranded DNA without specificity (Hildebrandt et al 1995;Agou et al 1999), and the DNA cleavage activity postulated for remodeling of the quadraplex was a contaminant (Dexheimer et al 2009). Another paper on the G-quadraplex binding activity of NDPK/Nm23 was published in a high-ranking journal and later retracted (Grand et al 2004).…”
Section: Concernsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This later complex is responsible for the newly described phosphotransferase function of nm23-H1 (Engel et al, 1995(Engel et al, , 1998Wagner et al, 1997). Other studies have shown that the catalytic activity of NDPKs can be dissociated from the antimetastatic function of nm23-H1 and from the indirect enhancement of c-myc expression by nm23-H2 (Berberich and Postel, 1995;Hartsough and Steeg, 1998;Michelotti et al, 1997;Postel et al, 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The second human NDPK, nm23-H2, acts indirectly as an enhancer of c-myc expression (Berberich and Postel, 1995;Michelotti et al, 1997;Postel et al, 1993). Similarly, nm23-H3 (DR) is di erentially expressed in blastic transformation of chronic myelogenous leukemia (Venturelli et al, 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%