2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.04.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NMR imaging study and multi-Fickian numerical simulation of moisture transfer in Norway spruce samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Lignin is hydrophobic, whereas cellulose and hemicellulose are hydrophilic. This coexistence and the multitude of different softening reactions due to water explain why the mechanical properties of wood are strongly dependent of water content [8]. In fresh Norway spruce, the moisture content, defined here as water mass to dry mass ratio, is about 50 % in heart wood and 130 % in sap wood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lignin is hydrophobic, whereas cellulose and hemicellulose are hydrophilic. This coexistence and the multitude of different softening reactions due to water explain why the mechanical properties of wood are strongly dependent of water content [8]. In fresh Norway spruce, the moisture content, defined here as water mass to dry mass ratio, is about 50 % in heart wood and 130 % in sap wood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particle methods are able to describe the complex geometries and include contacts also between not neighboring points [17]. However, the advanced FEM algorithms, which exploit both constitutive and geometrical nonlinear behavior, enable the analysis of wood cell deformations for a wider repertory like complex loading and boundary conditions and coupled hygro-thermomechanical analyses (see [8] and related references). A first version of such a method is introduced in the present paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A main drawback of X-ray radiography is the limited resolution in quantifying the water content. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is another imaging approach that has been used to visualize the spatial change of moisture content in wood [14][15][16]. Although spatial resolution reaches 78 m, the moisture resolution of MRI, while higher than X-ray radiography, lies between 2-4 kg/m 3 [15,16], thus may not capture small variations of moisture content.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NMR Imaging has been proven to be an excellent tool to determine the distribution and the concentration of water in wood during drying (Quick et al 2007;Stenström et al 2014;Dvinskikh et al 2011a, b), and during uptake (Robertson and Packer 1999;Van Meel et al 2011;Donkers et al 2013). In situ determination of local moisture content has been achieved by portable NMR devices (Casieri et al 2004;Dvinskikh et al 2011b). Another important advantage of NMR over other methods is its ability to distinguish between bound and free water by relaxation analysis (T 2 ), i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%