1999
DOI: 10.1021/bi990558n
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NMR Solution Conformation of an Antitoxic Analogue of α-Conotoxin GI: Identification of a Common Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor α1-Subunit Binding Surface for Small Ligands and α-Conotoxins,

Abstract: The three-dimensional solution conformation of an 11-residue antitoxic analogue of alpha-conotoxin GI, des-Glu1-[Cys3Ala]-des-Cys13-conotoxin GI (CANPACGRHYS-NH(2), designated "GI-15" henceforth), has been determined using two-dimensional (1)H NMR spectroscopy. The disulfide loop region (1C-6C) and the C-terminal tail (8R-11S) are connected by a flexible hinge formed near 7G, and the pairwise backbone rmsds for the former and the latter are 0.58 and 0.65 A, respectively. Superpositioning GI-15 with the structu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of trans-cis isomerization of prolines, minor peaks originating from a cis-conformer were noted. Similar cis conformers have been observed in other ␣-/␣A-conotoxins as well (13,27,34,41). Detailed analyses of NMR data and structure calculation have been carried out for the trans-isomer.…”
Section: Nmr Spectroscopy-completesupporting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because of trans-cis isomerization of prolines, minor peaks originating from a cis-conformer were noted. Similar cis conformers have been observed in other ␣-/␣A-conotoxins as well (13,27,34,41). Detailed analyses of NMR data and structure calculation have been carried out for the trans-isomer.…”
Section: Nmr Spectroscopy-completesupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Unfortunately, varying sizes and physicochemical properties of most nAChR ligands prevent straightforward comparison of their three-dimensional structures. Nevertheless, structural comparison among various ␣-/␣A-conotoxins is possible even though comparison has been limited because of the differences in the disulfide framework (13,24,27,28,34). Here, we report a high resolution NMR structure of ␣-conotoxin EI, an ␣4/7 subfamily member with a unique ␣ 1 /␦ specificity toward Torpedo neuromuscular nAChR (14).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the overall differences or local similarity among these toxins, it is certainly difficult to unambiguously define the respective subtype selectivities based only on such structural features (18). Binding determinants within the ␣4/7 subfamily are subtle and may not be immediately discernible, as can be judged from the fact that the overall structural fold is same, whereas only types of amino acids are varied.…”
Section: Solution Conformation Of ␣-Conotoxin Auibmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through structural elucidation of these highly selective ␣-conotoxins and their analogs (17,18), we have been using the reverse-mapping approach first to identify receptor subtype specific determinants in the ligands and second to indirectly probe the regions in nAChR responsible for binding agonists * This research was supported in part by Grant NB0980 from the Ministry of Science and Technology, Korea. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ligand binding modes of these residues have been confirmed in recent homology modeled structures of nAChRs (31) and the x-ray structures of AChBP bound to α-conotoxins (23,25,32) or α-cobratoxin (33). Another strategy for studying nAChR-ligand interactions has been to identify potential receptor-binding pharmacophores within various ligands including α-conotoxins (16,17,19,21,(34)(35)(36)(37). Here, we have generated high-resolution structures of ligand-nAChR complexes using α-conotoxin GIC, a well-known antagonistic ligand of nAChRs, and the extracellular domains of nAChRs that are homology modeled using the α1 subunit of mouse, which has much higher sequence homology with nAChR subunits than acetylcholine binding protein (AChBP).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%