2014
DOI: 10.1613/jair.4405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No Agent Left Behind: Dynamic Fair Division of Multiple Resources

Abstract: Recently fair division theory has emerged as a promising approach for allocation of multiple computational resources among agents. While in reality agents are not all present in the system simultaneously, previous work has studied static settings where all relevant information is known upfront. Our goal is to better understand the dynamic setting. On the conceptual level, we develop a dynamic model of fair division, and propose desirable axiomatic properties for dynamic resource allocation mechanisms. On the t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
86
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
86
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While the model is somewhat different, it has much in common with the cake cutting model. Other papers that study this research direction include papers by Dolev et al (2012), Gutman and Nisan (2012), Parkes et al (2014), and Kash et al (2014).…”
Section: Bibliography and Further Readingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the model is somewhat different, it has much in common with the cake cutting model. Other papers that study this research direction include papers by Dolev et al (2012), Gutman and Nisan (2012), Parkes et al (2014), and Kash et al (2014).…”
Section: Bibliography and Further Readingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to Kash et al [16], we denote the number of agents with link requirements as N = {1,…, n}, and the amount of resources agent i requires as Ri. Our example is different in that we consider some links as being extensively used while others are limited.…”
Section: Figure 8 Shapley Marginal Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A dynamic allocation mechanism is dynamic envy free (DEF) if at any step an agent i envies an agent j only if j arrived before i did and j has not been allocated any resources since i arrived [16].…”
Section: Figure 8 Shapley Marginal Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The model provides clients that are bottlenecked on the same device with allocations that are proportional to their fair shares, while allowing allocation ratios between clients in different bottleneck sets to be set by the allocator to maximize the utilization. No agent left behind [7] proposes a dynamic resource allocation mechanism. Also, all these approaches make the assumption that all jobs and/or resources are continuously divisible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%