1997
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2826.1997.00606.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NO and Angiotensin II Effects on Blood Pressure andFluid Homeostasis

Abstract: Angiotensin II (50 ng/5 microl) and L-NAME (250 microg/5 microl), an inhibitor of NO synthase (NOS), were administered intracerebroventricularly alone or in combination to conscious rats. Mean arterial blood pressure (MABP) increased reaching a peak within 5 min in all groups compared to controls treated with the vehicle, artificial CSF (5 microl). MABP returned to basal levels at 30 min after angiotensin II and remained stable for the following 90 min. In animals treated with L-NAME alone, after the initial p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The inhibition of the NO synthesis results in an imbalance between the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) and the NO system in favor of the RAS; thus the effects of ANG II may prevail (20,30). A substantial body of work has shown that central or peripheral blockade of NO synthesis potentiates or prolongs the pressor response to ANG II (9,28,31,33), upregulates AT 1 expression, and activates cardiovascular angiotensin-converting enzyme (49). On the other hand, ANG II has been found to regulate NOS activity and NO release (27,57).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The inhibition of the NO synthesis results in an imbalance between the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) and the NO system in favor of the RAS; thus the effects of ANG II may prevail (20,30). A substantial body of work has shown that central or peripheral blockade of NO synthesis potentiates or prolongs the pressor response to ANG II (9,28,31,33), upregulates AT 1 expression, and activates cardiovascular angiotensin-converting enzyme (49). On the other hand, ANG II has been found to regulate NOS activity and NO release (27,57).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, microinjection of either an NO synthase (NOS) inhibitor or ANG II into the lateral ventricle or the paraventricular nucleus (PVN) increases the discharge of renal sympathetic nerves and elevates arterial BP and heart rate (HR) (25,28,52). Central or peripheral blockade of NOS potentiates or prolongs the pressor response to ANG II (9,31). Conversely, overexpression of neuronal NOS (nNOS) within the PVN by adenoviral gene transfer significantly attenuates ANG II pressor responses (28).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possible reason is that NO suppresses the excitatory input to the PVN and SON and causes a reduction in sensitivity to osmotic stimuli in the diabetic state, because NO in the PVN and SON tonically inhibit secretion of AVP and oxytocin [21,22]. Furthermore, diabetes is known to induce changes in the noradreanline and adrenaline concentrations of the various brain regions, including the hypothalamus [1,2].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnocellular neurosecretory cells in the PVN and SON synthesize arginine vasopressin (AVP) and oxytocin and release them into the systemic cirulation from their axon terminals located in the posterior pituitary. Some studies have demonstrated that hypothalamic NO inhibits release of AVP [17,19,20] and central NO tonically inhibits basal release of AVP and oxytocin [21,22]. Thus, NO may play an important role in the modulation of secretion of AVP and oxytocin in the hypothalamo-neurohypophysial system [17,19,23].…”
Section: : 640±648]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Almost all studies of NO actions on oxytocin neurons show inhibitory effects. Thus, the NO donor sodium nitroprusside (SNP) and the NO precursor l ‐arginine inhibit SON neurons, whereas NOS inhibitors increase the activity of stimulated oxytocin neurons in vivo (Liu et al. , 1997; Srisawat et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%