2015
DOI: 10.1111/ijlh.12340
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No clinically relevant differences between capillary and venous blood cell counts in adult haematological patients using a nonautomated lancet

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
9
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
9
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to our study, they found no clinically significant differences between these tubes for CBC use [16]. In the literature, there are several studies that compare capillary blood taken from a SVT and venous blood taken from a vacuum tube; however, the results are conflicting [17][18][19]. In our study, venous blood collection was used for both tubes.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 94%
“…In contrast to our study, they found no clinically significant differences between these tubes for CBC use [16]. In the literature, there are several studies that compare capillary blood taken from a SVT and venous blood taken from a vacuum tube; however, the results are conflicting [17][18][19]. In our study, venous blood collection was used for both tubes.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 94%
“…During the incremental cycling tests, 95 KL capillary blood samples were collected immediately before, 5 and 7 min after rebreathing whereas in the RSA tests, a 2-mL venous blood sample was taken immediately before and 6 min after rebreathing. The different methods are believed to have a negligible effect on tHb-mass measurement (25). HbCO% also was measured directly after the RSA test but not after the incremental exercise test and so an estimation of the HbCO% during the last 2 min was made (26).…”
Section: Thb-mass Determination/co Administrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concordance between measurements of fingerprick and venous blood samples using a standard hematology analyzer had been reported to be high, in another study evaluating the performance of a novel microfluidic impedance cytometer for CBC at the point‐of‐care (POC) 2 . No clinically relevant differences between CB and VB cell counts in adult hematological patients, using nonautomated lancet versus automated, have been also shown in a more recent study 7 . In the present study, although the higher CB values of Hb, Hct, WBC, RBC, MCV, and MCH and the lower CB values of Plt were confirmed in both analyzers, the differences were clinically nonsignificant, as it is easily concluded, comparing the median CB versus VB values of all parameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In a previous study, capillary hemoglobin (Hb), hematocrit (Hct), white blood cells (WBC), red blood cells (RBC), mean corpuscular volume (MCV), and mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH) were all found significantly higher than the respective venous values, while Hb and platelet screening seemed equivalent with either CB or VB, using a hematology analyzer 4 . No clinically relevant differences between CB and VB cell counts in adult hematological patients, using a nonautomated lancet, have been shown by a different study 7 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation