1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0920-9964(97)00047-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No deficit in Wisconsin Card Sorting Test performance of schizophrenic patients' first-degree relatives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
23
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
6
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The association between poor executive functioning, assessed with the Wisconsin Card Sort Test, and progression to schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder is consistent with extensive literature regarding poor executive functioning and schizophrenia (Hughes et al 2005; Sitskoorn et al 2004; Cannon et al 2000; Bilder et al, 2000; Goldberg and Weinberger, 1988; Heaton and Pendleton, 1981), although findings in their unaffected family members have been less clear (Laurent et al 2001; Stratta et al 1997; Wolf et al 2002). However, this is the first report to suggest that lower executive functioning could be used as an additional risk marker to identify subjects at ultra-high risk for schizophrenia, identified via presence of psychotic symptoms subsyndromal for schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The association between poor executive functioning, assessed with the Wisconsin Card Sort Test, and progression to schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder is consistent with extensive literature regarding poor executive functioning and schizophrenia (Hughes et al 2005; Sitskoorn et al 2004; Cannon et al 2000; Bilder et al, 2000; Goldberg and Weinberger, 1988; Heaton and Pendleton, 1981), although findings in their unaffected family members have been less clear (Laurent et al 2001; Stratta et al 1997; Wolf et al 2002). However, this is the first report to suggest that lower executive functioning could be used as an additional risk marker to identify subjects at ultra-high risk for schizophrenia, identified via presence of psychotic symptoms subsyndromal for schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…In young high-risk relatives of SZ patients, EHRS found deficits in executive function (Johnstone et al, 2002; Byrne et al, 2003), while another study displayed poor performance on WCST in relatives of patients having a family history of SZ compared to relatives of patients without a family history of SZ (Birkett et al, 2008). Some studies have been equivocal (Stratta et al, 1997), suggesting further investigation.…”
Section: Nature Of Neurocognitive Deficits In Young Relatives At Riskmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Such results are in striking contrast to the majority of previous reports [19,20,21], where cognitive impairment is observed in both schizophrenia patients and their relatives. However, the current study is not unique in this regard since negative results of such comparisons have also been reported for executive functions [24,25] and other cognitive tests, e.g. the DST and Vocabulary [52].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Similarly, Snitz et al [19] report large differences in the Semantic Verbal Fluency Test and a weak to moderate effect size for other tasks. However, the results of various studies are far from univocal [24,25], and negative results have been reported as well. Concurrently, the presence of thought disorders in healthy subjects with a family history of schizophrenia has been described in many studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%