2022
DOI: 10.1101/2022.03.16.22272465
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No evidence for environmental transmission risk of SARS-CoV-2 in the UK’s largest urban river system: London as a case study

Abstract: The presence of SARS-CoV-2 in untreated sewage has been confirmed in many countries but its incidence and infection risk in contaminated freshwaters is still poorly understood. The River Thames in the UK receives untreated sewage from 57 Combined Sewer Overflows (CSOs), with many discharging dozens of times per year. We investigated if such discharges provide a pathway for environmental transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Samples of wastewater, surface water, and sediment collected close to six CSOs on the River Thame… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter study did not include an assessment for viable virus. Wastewater as a potential source or at least an indicator of disease prevalence is well studied 43 . It is reassuring that both proximal and distant wastewaters do not yield SARS‐CoV‐2 in culture, even though viral genome may be abundantly evident 44,45 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The latter study did not include an assessment for viable virus. Wastewater as a potential source or at least an indicator of disease prevalence is well studied 43 . It is reassuring that both proximal and distant wastewaters do not yield SARS‐CoV‐2 in culture, even though viral genome may be abundantly evident 44,45 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wastewater as a potential source or at least an indicator of disease prevalence is well studied. 43 It is reassuring that both proximal and distant wastewaters do not yield SARS-CoV-2 in culture, even though viral genome may be abundantly evident. 44,45 The latter provides some reassurance that decontamination of such fluids is not logistically required.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The infectious potential of SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater, freshwater, and seawater is reported to be maintained for <4 days. 22 , 24 , 25 However, the potential viral transmission risks via the fecal–oral route and/or aerosolization of SARS-CoV-2 contaminated waters remain poorly understood. The World Health Organization (WHO) has emphasized the need to explore the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in environmental matrices, including wastewater and surface water.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the genetic signal of SARS-CoV-2 has been extensively detected in untreated and treated wastewater and sludge samples from WWTPs, hospitals, isolation sites, aircraft, airports, university campus dormitories, and the Tokyo 2020 Olympic and Paralympic Village as well as natural water bodies, such as rivers, , seawater, and groundwater, in multiple countries and regions (Table S1). The infectious potential of SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater, freshwater, and seawater is reported to be maintained for <4 days. ,, However, the potential viral transmission risks via the fecal–oral route and/or aerosolization of SARS-CoV-2 contaminated waters remain poorly understood. The World Health Organization (WHO) has emphasized the need to explore the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in environmental matrices, including wastewater and surface water.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%