2013
DOI: 10.4103/0019-5154.113949
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No evidence of human papillomaviruses in non-genital seborrheic keratosis

Abstract: Background:Seborrheic keratosis (SK) is a benign epidermal tumor of unknown etiology. Because of its wart-like morphology, Human papillomaviruses (HPVs) have been suggested as a possible causative agent. Viral involvement, however, has not been confirmed yet despite research and the association between HPVs and seborrheic keratosis has not been studied among Iranian population by PCR.Objectives:The aim of this case-control study was to evaluate the presence of HPVs DNA in non-genital SK by PCR.Materials and Me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We would like to discuss on the report on “Human papillomavirus deoxyribonucleic acid in non-genital benign papillomatous skin lesion. [ 1 ]” Kambiz et al reported that “Human papillomavirus deoxyribonucleic acid may not be detected in non-genital benign papillomatous skin lesions by polymerase chain reaction.”[ 1 ] The result in this work is concordant with the previous report by Meibodi et al [ 2 ] There are many possible explanations for this finding. The null prevalence might be due to no viral infection in the studies skin lesions or there might be some problem in the laboratory analytical process.…”
supporting
confidence: 93%
“…We would like to discuss on the report on “Human papillomavirus deoxyribonucleic acid in non-genital benign papillomatous skin lesion. [ 1 ]” Kambiz et al reported that “Human papillomavirus deoxyribonucleic acid may not be detected in non-genital benign papillomatous skin lesions by polymerase chain reaction.”[ 1 ] The result in this work is concordant with the previous report by Meibodi et al [ 2 ] There are many possible explanations for this finding. The null prevalence might be due to no viral infection in the studies skin lesions or there might be some problem in the laboratory analytical process.…”
supporting
confidence: 93%