2024
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arae008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No geographical differences in male mate choice in a widespread fish, Limia perugiae

Chance Powell,
Ingo Schlupp

Abstract: Behavior, like most other traits, can have a spatial component and variability of behavior at the population level is predicted. In the present paper we explore male mate choice at this level. Male mate choice, while maybe not as common as female choice, is expected to evolve when males respond to significant variation in female quality and for example prefer females with higher fecundity. In fishes, higher fecundity is associated with larger body size, an easily measured trait. In the present study we investi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 79 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Smaller males usually invest less into male secondary characteristics (i.e., bold body and fin coloration and elaborate dorsal fins) and follow a sneaker tactic that relies on approaching females from behind and attempting to force copulations via gonopodial thrusting [ 97 99 ]. Large males, on the other hand, are usually very colorful, have elaborate dorsal fins, and rely on male courtship displays to attract female attention [ 98 , 100 ], with females generally preferring large over small males [ 46 , 99 ]. Smaller males investing more into relative testis size than larger males to facilitate their mating behavior of forced copulations makes intuitively sense and has been found before [ 101 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smaller males usually invest less into male secondary characteristics (i.e., bold body and fin coloration and elaborate dorsal fins) and follow a sneaker tactic that relies on approaching females from behind and attempting to force copulations via gonopodial thrusting [ 97 99 ]. Large males, on the other hand, are usually very colorful, have elaborate dorsal fins, and rely on male courtship displays to attract female attention [ 98 , 100 ], with females generally preferring large over small males [ 46 , 99 ]. Smaller males investing more into relative testis size than larger males to facilitate their mating behavior of forced copulations makes intuitively sense and has been found before [ 101 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%