2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-020-01367-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No identification of abrupt onsets that capture attention: evidence against a unified model of spatial attention

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…demonstrated that both task-relevant and task-irrelevant abrupt onset cues produced location benefits (indicative of attentional capture), but only the task-relevant cues produced distractor compatibility effects (indicative of attentional engagement). Analogous results were found by Maxwell et al (2020), who also found distractor compatibility effects for cues that did not match any target features, but only when they were predictive of target location. These findings suggest that attentional engagement is strictly dependent on top-down goals, whereas attentional capture may also be triggered by bottom-up saliency signals alone under some conditions.…”
Section: Evidence For An Engagement Thresholdsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…demonstrated that both task-relevant and task-irrelevant abrupt onset cues produced location benefits (indicative of attentional capture), but only the task-relevant cues produced distractor compatibility effects (indicative of attentional engagement). Analogous results were found by Maxwell et al (2020), who also found distractor compatibility effects for cues that did not match any target features, but only when they were predictive of target location. These findings suggest that attentional engagement is strictly dependent on top-down goals, whereas attentional capture may also be triggered by bottom-up saliency signals alone under some conditions.…”
Section: Evidence For An Engagement Thresholdsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Looking ahead: Prospects and challenges for the diachronic approach to attentional selectivity In this paper, we have reviewed studies that provide evidence for the existence of attentional episodes, identify the conditions for triggering such episodes (e.g., Goller et al, 2020;Maxwell et al, 2020;, and delineate the factors that affect their onset latency and duration (Brisson et al, 2007;Foster et al, 2020;Callahan-Flintoft & Wyble, 2017;Töllner et al, 2011;Zivony & Eimer, 2021). Many other aspects of the attentional blink phenomena that we could not discuss here are also in line with our general framework.…”
Section: Looking Back: a New Resolution To An Old Problemmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In a recent spatial cueing study, Zivony and Lamy (2018, see also Maxwell, Gaspelin & Ruthruff, 2020) reported both a cue validity effect and an effect of the compatibility between the cued distractor and the target when the cue matched the observer's attentional set (e.g., a red cue in search for a red target), but only a cue validity effect when the cue did not match this set (e.g., a green cue in search for a red target). The authors concluded that unlike goal-directed capture, stimulus-driven capture elicits "shallow shifts of attention", that is, attentional shifts (indexed by cue validity effects) that are not followed by attentional engagement (indexed by compatibility effects).…”
Section: Alternative Accounts For the Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%