2017
DOI: 10.1111/tid.12822
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No indication of increased infection rates using low‐dose alemtuzumab instead of anti‐thymocyte globulin as graft‐versus‐host disease prophylaxis before allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Abstract: We saw no indication of increased infections rates when using low-dose alemtuzumab as GvHD prophylaxis before allogeneic stem cell transplantation in this retrospective analysis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some said that personalized ATG dosage for GVHD prophylaxis may improve outcomes after transplantation [13,14]. In recent years, low dose therapies of alemtuzumab (0.5 mg/kg) [8] and ATG (2-6 mg/kg) have been developing [15][16][17]. The dosage of ATG varied depending on the studies, and individual dosing was reported to improve reconstitution of CD4 T cell and optimal dosage may differ among races.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some said that personalized ATG dosage for GVHD prophylaxis may improve outcomes after transplantation [13,14]. In recent years, low dose therapies of alemtuzumab (0.5 mg/kg) [8] and ATG (2-6 mg/kg) have been developing [15][16][17]. The dosage of ATG varied depending on the studies, and individual dosing was reported to improve reconstitution of CD4 T cell and optimal dosage may differ among races.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, the administration of alemtuzumab seems to be associated with a lower incidence of reactivation, most likely due to its anti-B-cell properties [29,34]. In a study comparing ATG and alemtuzumab, the prevalence of EBV reactivation was 100% vs 58%, respectively [4], although not confirmed in another study [35]. These recent data underscore that all T-depletion strategies may not equally influence the risk of EBV reactivation, depending on their impact on decreasing B cells (the EBV reservoir) and on depleting T cells, more particularly EBV-specific memory T cells present in the graft.…”
Section: Incidence Of Ebv-dnaemia After Allogeneic Hsctmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Several studies used multivariate analysis to examine the relationship between recipient sex and post-transplant active EBV infection [4,35,39,50,52,56,65,68,69,72,74,76,85,86,88,89,96,101] or PTLD [16,27,40,56,88,94,95,98]; none found a significant association. Three out of six studies [35,53,56,65,79,101] that analyzed the association between donor sex and post-HSCT active EBV infection showed a statistically significant association but in the opposite direction. In two studies, the risk for active EBV infection post-HSCT was higher in patients receiving a male donor transplant [53,56] while, in the other, patients receiving a female donor transplant appeared to be at greater risk [65].…”
Section: Other Risk Factorsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…ATG use appears to be an important risk factor for the development of active posttransplant EBV infection or PTLD. Among 15 multivariate studies [4,41,45,46,51,53,56,66,68,69,74,79,85,86,96] that examined the association between ATG and active post-transplant EBV infection, 10 found a statistically significant association: Cesaro et al [41] (HR = 13.0 (95% CI: 2-96)), Fan et al [53] (OR = 7.69 (95% CI: 1.17-50.49)), Juvonen et al [66] (HR = 5.78 (95% CI: 2.47-13.5)), Liu et al [74] (HR = 14.081 (95% CI: 6.02-32.92)), Peric et al [85] (SHR = 4.9 (95% CI: 1.1-21.0)), Van Esser et al [96] (HR = 3.4 (95% CI: 1.6-1)), Gao et al [56] (HR = 6.3 (95% CI: 1.6-24.0)), Düver et al [51] (OR = 10.68 (95% CI: 1.15-98.86)), Ru et al [86] (HR = 4.29 (95% CI: 2.64-6.97)) and Kullberg-Lindh et al [68] (slope = 1.34; p = 0.004). All studies compared patients who received ATG versus those who did not, but one: Van Esser et al [96] reported the risk of EBV infection in patients receiving T-cell depleted (TCD) grafts with ATG versus patients receiving non-TCD grafts.…”
Section: Graft-versus-host Disease Prophylaxis/treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%