1992
DOI: 10.1183/09031936.93.05060707
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No influence of airway heat flux on airflow-induced bronchospasm

Abstract: We used a canine model of airway reactivity to examine the role of airway heat flux in the response to dry air challenge. Airflow-induced bronchospasm (AIB) was assessed by measuring collateral system resistance (Rcs) with a wedged bronchoscope technique in anaesthetized mechanically ventilated dogs. We manipulate post-challenge airway heat flux by exposing peripheral airways to cool dry air (23.9 +/- 0.3 degrees C, 0.8 +/- 0.2 mgH2O.l-1), cool humid air (24.2 +/- 0.2 degrees C, 21.5 +/- 0.3 mgH2O.l-1), or war… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1993
1993
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Example 6: Ending of a Discussion [4] H In summary, this study in dogs shows that rapid rewarming of peripheral airways, in itself, does not exacerbate airway obstruction induced by cool dry air challenge. 1 We speculate that rapid rewarming of peripheral airways, in itself, also does not exacerbate airway obstruction induced by cool dry air challenge in asthmatic human subjects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Example 6: Ending of a Discussion [4] H In summary, this study in dogs shows that rapid rewarming of peripheral airways, in itself, does not exacerbate airway obstruction induced by cool dry air challenge. 1 We speculate that rapid rewarming of peripheral airways, in itself, also does not exacerbate airway obstruction induced by cool dry air challenge in asthmatic human subjects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Example 5: Middle of a Discussion [4) c The exacerbated airway obstruction during warm humid air recovery reported by others 1 6. 17 might be explained by differences in experimental design, ... etc.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations