2020
DOI: 10.3390/bs10110165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No Laughing Matter: How Humor Styles Relate to Feelings of Loneliness and Not Mattering

Abstract: Loneliness and feeling that one does not matter are closely linked, but further investigation is needed to determine differentiating features. The relationship between not mattering to others (anti-mattering) and loneliness was explored by assessing how the two constructs correlated with an interpersonal dimension, specifically four humor styles (affiliative, self-enhancing, self-defeating, and aggressive). One hundred and fifty-eight women and 96 men completed a three-item loneliness scale, a new measure of a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
10
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the AMS is a unidimensional measure. These results are consistent with a psychometric analysis conducted on the AMS responses of a sample of undergraduates in a management study program (MacDonald et al, 2020). The next CFA with anti-mattering and mattering items both included evaluated the presence of two separate, but correlated factors.…”
Section: Confirmatory Factor Analysessupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Therefore, the AMS is a unidimensional measure. These results are consistent with a psychometric analysis conducted on the AMS responses of a sample of undergraduates in a management study program (MacDonald et al, 2020). The next CFA with anti-mattering and mattering items both included evaluated the presence of two separate, but correlated factors.…”
Section: Confirmatory Factor Analysessupporting
confidence: 81%
“…For future HSQ development, then, researchers should consider reducing the number of options. Our data show that a five-point scale outperforms a seven-point scale, but we think researchers should explore other rating scales when revising the HSQ, such as the four-point scale used in the Italian HSQ [27] or further examining the three-point scale explored in recent work [26]. The ideal rating scale for an intended respondent population is an empirical issue, so future scale development work should empirically evaluate its rating scale relative to promising alternatives.…”
Section: Rating Scale Analysis: Is Seven Points Too Many?mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The HSQ was developed with a seven-point Likert-type rating scale, a common number in the self-report assessment of individual differences, and most published research appears to have used seven response options. Many researchers, however, have used five-point scales in their HSQ research [24,25], and some have used three-point scales [26]. Some translations of the HSQ have adopted other rating scales, such as the four-point scale used in the Italian version [27].…”
Section: Rating Scale Analysis: Is Seven Points Too Many?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The construct of anti-mattering is in the early stages of development and has been examined far less frequently than mattering (Flett, 2018a). Some studies have found strong cross-sectional associations between loneliness and anti-mattering (MacDonald et al, 2020;McComb et al, 2020). In a recent study, a positive association between anti-mattering and distress (i.e., stress, anxiety, and depression) was found, although these data were collected during the COVID-19 pandemic (Besser et al, 2020).…”
Section: Mattering and Depressionmentioning
confidence: 94%