2014
DOI: 10.1111/jzo.12123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

No preference in female sika deer for conspecific over heterospecific male sexual calls in a mate choice context

Abstract: (2014) No preference in female sika deer for conspecific over heterospecific male sexual calls in a mate choice context. Journal of Zoology, 293 (2). pp. [92][93][94][95][96][97][98][99] This version is available from Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/50508/ This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies and may differ from the published version or from the version of record. If you wish to cite this item you are advised to consult the publisher's version. Please see the U… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
11
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
2
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…pupfishes: Kodric-Brown and West, 2014; woodrats: Shurtliff et al, 2013). For deer, preferences for interspecific male vocalizations differ for red and sika females (Wyman et al, 2014). However, our results did not show significant differences in copulation probability between the two heterospecific female-male combinations, suggesting that the barrier is probably similarly weak between both species.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…pupfishes: Kodric-Brown and West, 2014; woodrats: Shurtliff et al, 2013). For deer, preferences for interspecific male vocalizations differ for red and sika females (Wyman et al, 2014). However, our results did not show significant differences in copulation probability between the two heterospecific female-male combinations, suggesting that the barrier is probably similarly weak between both species.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…Lowe and Gardiner () reported intermediate craniological morphology for putative hybrids in the Lake District, and in a well‐documented hybrid swarm in County Wicklow (Ireland), Harrington () observed a general merging of size and pelage of animals in the region. Similarly, vocalizations of red deer‐sika hybrids are intermediate between parental species (Long, Moore, & Hayden, ; Wyman, Locatelli, Charlton, & Reby, ). Carcass weight, jaw length, and incisor arcade breadth are all greater in sika‐like hybrids than in “pure” sika and lower in red deer‐like hybrid females than in “pure” red deer females (for definition of “pure”; see Senn, Swanson et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As sexual interactions usually involve a rich communicatory exchange (Coyne & Orr, ), in some scenarios multiple signals are used to recognize conspecifics, whereas in others a single signal can give information about more than one individual trait, such as sexual identity and mate quality (Candolin, ; Hebets & Papaj, ; Rypstra et al ., ). Sometimes, only some communication channels are involved in species recognition and they can be in conflict with those channels concerning mate choice (Leonard & Hedrick, ; Velásquez et al ., ) or lead to potential misleading recognition, especially between closely related species (Wyman et al ., ). Spiders with complex courtship behaviours (involving more than one communication channel), such as salticids, agelenids, and lycosids, have been considered good candidates for studying the function of the different communication signals (Uetz & Denterlein, ; Costa & Capocasale, ; Hebets & Uetz, ; Elias, Hebets & Hoy, ; Galasso, ; Chiarle & Isaia, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%