2001
DOI: 10.1134/1.1424363
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nodal and periastron precession of inclined orbits in the field of a rotating black hole

Abstract: The inclination of low-eccentricity orbits is shown to significantly affect the orbital parameters, in particular, the Keplerian, nodal precession, and periastron rotation frequencies, which are interpreted in terms of observable quantities. For the nodal precession and periastron rotation frequencies of low-eccentricity orbits in a Kerr field, we derive a Taylor expansion in terms of the Kerr parameter at arbitrary orbital inclinations to the black-hole spin axis and at arbitrary radial coordinates. The parti… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This quantity has been calculated by other methods [10] whose result coincides with ours, also see [2] to leading-pN-order. Notice that one can replace the Carter-like constant C by L in the Eqs.…”
Section: The Underlying Action Principlesupporting
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This quantity has been calculated by other methods [10] whose result coincides with ours, also see [2] to leading-pN-order. Notice that one can replace the Carter-like constant C by L in the Eqs.…”
Section: The Underlying Action Principlesupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In this case, C = L = L z and our precession angle Φ agrees to leading pN order with Eq. (53) in [2], where it is called the nodal precession rate. Furthermore, the leading-order linear-in-a terms of ∆ Ū and ∆ Φ fully agree with the results in [7] for the case of an inclined orbital plane when referred to the test-mass limit.…”
Section: The Underlying Action Principlementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The observed inconsistency of the RPM may stem from the fact that the orbital inclination of the test particle in the model simplification is assumed to be infinitesimal. An exact solution for an arbitrary inclination is given in Sibgatullin (2001). In such an analysis, the frequency ν HBO for fixed mass and angular momentum can change by a factor of ∼ 3 as the inclination changes from 0 to π/2 (for the marginally stable orbit at M N S = 2M ⊙ and ν φ = 1200 Hz).…”
Section: Discussion and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%