1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-682x(97)00064-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noise barriers with reactive surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus the approximation of the integral equation for the rigid ground over an admittance surface reduces to [4,5]:…”
Section: Numerical Modelling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus the approximation of the integral equation for the rigid ground over an admittance surface reduces to [4,5]:…”
Section: Numerical Modelling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A numerical study of the insertion loss (IL) of some rectangular, T-shaped and cylindrical edged noise barriers with rigid, absorbing and soft surfaces has been carried out by Fujiwara et al [4]. In their study, they found that the most efficient design was a T-shape with a soft upper surface.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 9 indicates that ÁL edge ð S ; R ; f Þ for 500 Hz decreases with decreasing R , but conversely, it increases at 315 Hz. Figure 10 indicates that ÁL edge ð S ; R ; f Þ depends strongly on frequency because of the resonance inside channels [10]. A significantly large sound reduction is obtained from 400 to 630 Hz, where the channels are designed to minimize sound pressure around their open ends.…”
Section: Results Of Efficiency Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The figure shows cross-sectional profiles; noise sources are assumed to be located on the left-hand side and receivers are on the opposite side. Four profiles are to be investigated: devices with an absorbing top or channels parallel to the barrier edge [10]. Hereafter, these four …”
Section: Edge Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental results of the performance of barriers having different shapes and surface conditions under well controlled environment showed that a soft 3 m high T-shaped barrier provided the same performance as a 10 m high plain barrier (Ishizuka, 2004). Fujiwara et al (1998) described the results of BEM modelling of a T-shaped barrier with a soft upper surface. A uniform level of wells in the upper surface of a T-shaped barriers produce insertion loss values equal to those of a soft surface over a significant range of frequencies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%