2017
DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2017.1306631
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noise disturbance in open-plan study environments: a field study on noise sources, student tasks and room acoustic parameters

Abstract: The aim of this study is to gain more insight in the assessment of noise in open-plan study environments and to reveal correlations between noise disturbance experienced by students and the noise sources they perceive, the tasks they perform and the acoustic parameters of the open-plan study environment they work in. Data were collected in five open-plan study environments at universities in the Netherlands. A questionnaire was used to investigate student tasks, perceived sound sources and their perceived dist… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
26
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The systematic review identified nine studies of associations of environmental noise on cognition [39,48,[84][85][86][87][88][89][90]. Studies examined child and adult samples.…”
Section: Grade Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The systematic review identified nine studies of associations of environmental noise on cognition [39,48,[84][85][86][87][88][89][90]. Studies examined child and adult samples.…”
Section: Grade Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two other studies known to the authors were also added [94,95], along with another recent conference paper [93]. Six studies were excluded after data extraction (Appendix A.2) which included two studies which reported experimental studies [84,85]; one that reported on mental health and not cognition and had already been identified in the search for mental health [39]; one which did not report on noise exposure per se [89], and another study which reported an ADHD outcome, which was moved to the mental health review [48]. One study reported on attitudes to noise within the school and did not report a cognitive outcome [90].…”
Section: Grade Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Researchers in the field have provided empirical evidence regarding the effects of the environment and the setting on performance and health, mainly in the workplace but also in different contexts of human activity. For instance, Dul and Ceylan (2011) studied work environments to foster creativity; Oliveira, Gaspar, André, and Quintela (2014) developed a subjective analysis of working in cold environments; Smith and Bayeh (2003) analyzed the impact of ergonomic improvements in the computer workstation on productivity; and Braat‐Eggen, van Heijst, Hornikx, and Kohlrausch (2017) developed a field study to measure noise disturbance on students in open‐plan study environments. On the other hand, Jordan (2002) argued that Human Factors should evolve to including the users' affective responses along with usability and performance.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the house sometimes could not be suitable for smart-working (teaching) or attending eLearning courses; indeed some people have to deal with the bad ergonomics of working at the kitchen table or managing the constraint time for family or children [21]. For example, some distractions could arise, such as television, phone calls, pets wanting attention, barking, climbing on furniture, or being noisy, family visitors, disturbance from doorbells, washing machines, or vacuum cleaners, noise from stereos, radios, tape players, or musical instruments, feelings of tiredness and restlessness [22][23][24][25][26][27]. The use of technology can be a source of distraction [28][29][30][31][32] since technological devices could present an easy outlet for coping with negative experience and boredom during homework completion [29], especially for "multitasking generation" [33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%