2013
DOI: 10.1080/19338244.2012.732122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noise Exposure of Workers and the Use of Hearing Protection Equipment in New Zealand

Abstract: Hearing loss from occupational noise exposure is a significant occupational health problem, requiring effective health and safety strategies. Essential to this is an understanding of the noise exposure of workers and the use of hearing protection equipment (HPE). This study reports on data collected in New Zealand. Visits were made to companies in each economic sector. Personal dosimetry was used to assess individual noise exposure of 529 workers. Workers were also interviewed about their use of HPE. Overall, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reviewed records attest that participating companies were conducting noise risk assessments for regulatory compliance purposes (HSE, 2006 ; Russ, 2010 ), and for satisfying internal voluntary standards. The noise risk assessment records were also indicative that companies had prior knowledge of the existence of and the potential threat posed by prevailing occupational health hazards (John et al, 2014 ; Kates, 1977 ), especially occupational noise, inherent of machinery and equipment operated in industrial processes (John et al, 2014 ; Reinhold et al, 2009 ). The noise risk assessments also allowed the participating companies to identify at-risk employees to the prevailing hazards and risks (HSE, 1995 ), and gathered information required to determine the probability of risk occurrence and its subsequent consequence (Ostrom & Wilhemsen, 2012 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reviewed records attest that participating companies were conducting noise risk assessments for regulatory compliance purposes (HSE, 2006 ; Russ, 2010 ), and for satisfying internal voluntary standards. The noise risk assessment records were also indicative that companies had prior knowledge of the existence of and the potential threat posed by prevailing occupational health hazards (John et al, 2014 ; Kates, 1977 ), especially occupational noise, inherent of machinery and equipment operated in industrial processes (John et al, 2014 ; Reinhold et al, 2009 ). The noise risk assessments also allowed the participating companies to identify at-risk employees to the prevailing hazards and risks (HSE, 1995 ), and gathered information required to determine the probability of risk occurrence and its subsequent consequence (Ostrom & Wilhemsen, 2012 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 2 presents known incompatibilities between HPD characteristics and those of the two other triad components and which were mainly gathered from a reference book [1] (see chapter 11) but also from the grey literature [66], research papers focusing on specific issues associated with HPD use [67][68][69] and a general survey on HPD use [70]. These incompatibilities can generate discomforts and thus lead to preferences for a given type of HPD, or in the worst case to the non-use of the HPD.…”
Section: Limitations Of Existing Behavioral Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Earplugs are preferred by individuals favoring discrete hearing protectors and/or concerned with their hairstyle [1] Earmuffs can be difficult to wear in hot environments [1,67,68] Over-attenuating HPDs can block important environmental sounds such as alarm signals, machine sound and colleagues' speech [1] Earmuffs reduce the localization of the noise sources more than earplugs [69] HPD/Work environment Earplug insertion and removal can be time consuming and incompatible with work tasks when many removals are required during the work shift (and thus, earmuff are preferred in this case [1,70]) Earmuffs can interfere with movements when work is carried out in a tight space [1] Compared to earmuffs, earplug efficiency is more dependent on user training, skill and motivation [1] HPD requiring a periodic re-positioning is not adapted to work tasks based on a fast pace of repetitive movements [71] 1.…”
Section: Hpd/personmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instructors, the gym hall is characterized as an occupational environment, whereas for users, it is a leisure environment. Although the main purpose of fitness gyms is to improve the users' physical fitness and quality of life, such an environment with excessive exposure to loud music can be harmful to both instructors' and users' hearing [10][11][12][13]. Assessments of noise exposure in sports instructors have shown very high continuous equivalent sound pressure levels [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%