2015
DOI: 10.3397/1/376310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noise generated by ventilated supercavities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The amplitude of the forcing function, F o , was estimated to be 11.63 m 2 /sec 2 . This assumes that the fluctuating external cavity pressure amplitude is equal to the fluctuating internal pressure amplitude, which was typically 3.5 kPa for a pulsating cavity with an average radius of 2.3 cm inside of the 0.305 m diameter water tunnel ( Skidmore et al, 2015a ). Modulation strength values range from 0.10 to 0.25, which correspond to oscillations about the constant ventilation rate resonance frequency from 4.9% to 11.8%, respectively.…”
Section: Model For the Control Of Ventilated Supercavity Pulsationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The amplitude of the forcing function, F o , was estimated to be 11.63 m 2 /sec 2 . This assumes that the fluctuating external cavity pressure amplitude is equal to the fluctuating internal pressure amplitude, which was typically 3.5 kPa for a pulsating cavity with an average radius of 2.3 cm inside of the 0.305 m diameter water tunnel ( Skidmore et al, 2015a ). Modulation strength values range from 0.10 to 0.25, which correspond to oscillations about the constant ventilation rate resonance frequency from 4.9% to 11.8%, respectively.…”
Section: Model For the Control Of Ventilated Supercavity Pulsationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The "pinch off" or terminus of the cavity is considered to be the point where the local cavity diameter becomes less than that of the cavitator ( Paryshev, 2003 ). This process results in a strong monopole sound source ( Skidmore et al, 2015a;Pierce, 1989 ). A typical pulsating supercavity generated in the ARL Penn State 0.305 m diameter water tunnel is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Park et al (2009) proposed noisesource localization methods for conducting water-tunnel experiments using matched field processing and source-strength estimation techniques, which could be applied to propeller noise experiments under shallow water conditions. Skidmore et al (2015Skidmore et al ( , 2016) studied ventilated super-cavitation and its hydro-acoustic noise. They measured the hydrodynamic pressure both inside and outside the artificial cavities and analyzed the hydro-acoustic characteristics based on the types of cavitation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%