2006
DOI: 10.5589/m06-029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noise reduction and best band selection techniques for improving classification results using hyperspectral data: application to lithological mapping in Canada's Arctic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The minimum noise fraction (MNF) (Harris et al ), smoothed estimated reliability measure (SERM, Bachmann et al ), class‐based version of PCA (CPCA, Miao et al ) and MRF are a few well‐known techniques to enhance classification performance. Morphological profiles (MPs) (Licciardi et al ) have been proposed in the recent literature to achieve better results for the classification of remotely sensed data.…”
Section: Associated Pre‐processing Techniques and Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The minimum noise fraction (MNF) (Harris et al ), smoothed estimated reliability measure (SERM, Bachmann et al ), class‐based version of PCA (CPCA, Miao et al ) and MRF are a few well‐known techniques to enhance classification performance. Morphological profiles (MPs) (Licciardi et al ) have been proposed in the recent literature to achieve better results for the classification of remotely sensed data.…”
Section: Associated Pre‐processing Techniques and Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparatively, PCA has been found much simpler, computationally more robust, and more efficient, as it does not require prior statistical information (Chutia et al ). On the other hand, MNF is the second major algorithm belonging to the family of PCA techniques; however, it requires prior estimation of signal and noise covariance matrices and it is computationally more expensive than PCA (Harris et al ). ICA is also computationally more expensive, which limits its application to high‐dimensional data analysis and is more relevant for classification (Du et al ).…”
Section: Evaluation Of Existing Classification Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Minimum noise fraction eigenvectors 1, 3-6 and 10 were exported to ArcMap for further classification processing since their eigenvalues were greater than five (similarly to e.g. Harris et al, 2006), and were visually coherent. Normalized differential vegetation index (NDVI) was also produced (red = band 6, 572.86-580.12 nm; NIR = band 13, 776.83-784.42 nm).…”
Section: Neural Network Classification and Accuracy Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possible solution for mitigating the effects of the Hughes phenomenon is to reduce the dimensionality of the data but at the same time keep as much information as possible. For example, commonly used dimensionality reduction methods include feature selection and feature extraction methods [ 5 - 9 ], principal components analysis (PCA) with conventional classification methods [ 10 ], Minimum Noise Fraction [ 11 ], orthogonal subspace projection classification methods [ 12 ], support vector machine (SVM) classifiers [ 13 - 18 ], and spectral angle mapper and spectral information divergence methods [ 19 , 20 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%