2012
DOI: 10.1063/1.4737636
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noise sensitivity of a mass detection method using vibration modes of coupled microcantilever arrays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DeMartini, Rhoads, Shaw, and Turner (2007); DeMartini et al, 2008) extended the approach to a coupled array of sensors that allowed for a single readout for all the sensor elements. Spletzer, Raman, Reifenberger, Wu, and Xu (2005), Spletzer, Raman, Sumali, and Sullivan (2008), Spletzer, Raman, Wu, Xu, and Reifenberger (2006), Thiruvenkatanathan, Woodhouse, Yan, and Seshia (2011), Thiruvenkatanathan, Yan,Woodhouse, Aziz, and Seshia (2010), and Ryan, Judge, Vignola, and Glean (2012) were among the first to investigate capitalizing on the coupling between sensing elements as a mechanism to improve the performance of a given mass sensor design. In these cases, measured system response shape changes were used to infer variations in the mass distribution as a result of mass adsorption and subsequent localization of vibration energy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DeMartini, Rhoads, Shaw, and Turner (2007); DeMartini et al, 2008) extended the approach to a coupled array of sensors that allowed for a single readout for all the sensor elements. Spletzer, Raman, Reifenberger, Wu, and Xu (2005), Spletzer, Raman, Sumali, and Sullivan (2008), Spletzer, Raman, Wu, Xu, and Reifenberger (2006), Thiruvenkatanathan, Woodhouse, Yan, and Seshia (2011), Thiruvenkatanathan, Yan,Woodhouse, Aziz, and Seshia (2010), and Ryan, Judge, Vignola, and Glean (2012) were among the first to investigate capitalizing on the coupling between sensing elements as a mechanism to improve the performance of a given mass sensor design. In these cases, measured system response shape changes were used to infer variations in the mass distribution as a result of mass adsorption and subsequent localization of vibration energy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fabrication errors or uncertainty can have detrimental effects on the realized performance of systems fabricated with a given design strategy. Philosophically, this robustness issue can be expressed in terms of the sensitivity of a design to error in the distributions of the oscillators [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mode localization has also been used in accelerometers [27] and light processing applications [28]. Previous reports highlight the influence of various system parameters such as the mass-ratio [24], measurement noise [23], non-ideal clamping [29], coupling stiffness [30], anisotropy of the Youngs modulus [31], and global and dissipative coupling [32] on the array dynamics. In these arrayed structures, vibrations are possible only within the allowed propagation band [33], defined as the interval of frequencies between the lower ( f L ) and the upper ( f U ) cut-off values.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these arrayed structures, vibrations are possible only within the allowed propagation band [33], defined as the interval of frequencies between the lower ( f L ) and the upper ( f U ) cut-off values. While most of the previous studies were focused on arrays of identical or almost identical beams [23, 26, 3336], relatively few works considered the case of beams with differing resonant frequencies [13,21,37,38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%