2012
DOI: 10.1002/sca.21055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noise Variance Estimation Using Image Noise Cross‐Correlation Model on SEM Images

Abstract: A number of techniques have been proposed during the last three decades for noise variance and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) estimation in digital images. While some methods have shown reliability and accuracy in SNR and noise variance estimations, other methods are dependent on the nature of the images and perform well on a limited number of image types. In this article, we prove the accuracy and the efficiency of the image noise cross-correlation estimation model, vs. other existing estimators, when applied to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rather it can be found by extrapolation from the values r(N) to r(+N) whereas noise does not seem in the correlation [i.e. ri(x)rs(x)r(x), for x0; Sim et al ., ]. In this paper we estimate rs(0) from ACF of noisy image by removing the power of noise using a cubic spline interpolation with Savitzky–Golay filters and WLSE smoothing technique.…”
Section: Signal and Noise Illuminationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather it can be found by extrapolation from the values r(N) to r(+N) whereas noise does not seem in the correlation [i.e. ri(x)rs(x)r(x), for x0; Sim et al ., ]. In this paper we estimate rs(0) from ACF of noisy image by removing the power of noise using a cubic spline interpolation with Savitzky–Golay filters and WLSE smoothing technique.…”
Section: Signal and Noise Illuminationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique is simple and easy to implement. It works by reducing the amount of intensity variation between one pixel and the adjacent pixel (Sim et al ., ). However, there are two drawbacks from the average filter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Sim et al . (a, , ) have studied the final noise in SEM images. They assumed this noise is additive white noise and have developed many methods for estimating image signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) based on image cross‐correlation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to generate virtual SEM images, Cizmar et al (2008) have considered that the final image noise is an addition of a Poisson distribution representing primary emission and a Gaussian distribution representing the others types of noise in the SEM (secondary emission and electronics). Sim et al (2004aSim et al ( , 2011Sim et al ( , 2013 have studied the final noise in SEM images. They assumed this noise is additive white noise and have developed many methods for estimating image signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) based on image cross-correlation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%