Nomenklatorische Probleme in der GattungMatricaria L.

Rauschert, Stephan

doi:10.1007/bf02853147

Cited by 20 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Nomenclatural concerns by Rauschert (1974) that could have led to a change of name for Matricaria have been discussed and argued against by Jeffrey (1979) and Bremer and Humphries (1993). Information on flavonoids is available for six species in all, but the majority of citations deal with M recutita (cited as M chamomilla; synonym fide Bremer and Humphries, 1993).…”

Section: Flavonoid Datamentioning

confidence: 98%

Flavonoids of the Sunflower Family (Asteraceae)

Bohm

Stuessy

2001

120

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically those of translation, reprinting, re-use of illustrations, broadcasting, reproduction by photocopying machines or similar means, and storage in data banks. This book is dedicated to:Arthur Cronquist Outstanding plant systematist and major contributor to understanding taxonomic relationships within Asteraceae and Ralph E. Alston (1925Alston ( -1967) Visionary natural products chemist and geneticist who pioneered the use of chemical data in studies of plant systematics and evolution PrefaceCertainly many of the readers of this book will remember the early developments of chemosystematics in the late 1950s. We ourselves remember the excitement of these new data bearing on plant interrelationships. The hopes were high, the techniques were rapidly evolving, the quantities of data were large, and young workers were eagerly enthusiastic. Some even went so far as to predict that chemical data would soon replace morphological information as the basis for plant classification. These overly zealous predictions did not materialize, of course, as the history of plant systematics has amply shown during the past two centuries. If there is any distinct characteristic of systematics it is synthesis, as Lincoln Constance (1964) called it, the "unending synthesis." New tools generate new data and provide insights on additional dimensions of plant relationships. This will never change-we will continue to discover new tools and new data in the years ahead, and they will continue to be incorporated into the predictive general reference system of classification.The earlier efforts in chemosystematics focused on secondary plant products: alkaloids, betacyanins, carbohydrates, cyanogenic glycosides, glucosinolates, lipids, terpenoids, and especialiy flavonoids. The latter were particularly well suited for chemosystematic investigation for several reasons: ease of isolation and characterization, small amounts of plant material needed for analysis, stability of compounds especially through routine preparation of herbarium specimens, and low cost to obtain useful information. As a result of these considerable advantages, literally thousands of studies on use of flavonoids in plant systematics have been published. Although now with the present zest for macromolecular data from DNA restriction sites and sequences, there are fewer workers and laboratories dedicated to flavonoid chemosystematic studies; twenty years ago they were the new currency of exciting data in plant systematics.Because of many workers historically interested in the sunflower family, Asteraceae (or Compositae), in part due to its large size (approximately 23,000 species;Bremer, 1994), and because hundreds of flavonoid compounds were discovered in this family, many chemosystematic investigations have been completed on various taxa. Many studies came from the laboratories of R. A. Alston, B. L. Turner, and T. J. Mabry in the Department of Botany ...

show abstract

Section: Flavonoid Datamentioning

confidence: 98%

Flavonoids of the Sunflower Family (Asteraceae)

Bohm

Stuessy

2001

120

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Initially, Tripleurospermum was assigned to the genus Matricaria, but later was recognized as a separete genus on the basis of the different structure of its fruit and the occurence of a tetrasporic embryo sac (Harling 1951). However, Rauschert (1974) and Kay (1976) misapplied the name Matricaria to refer exclusively to the species of Tripleurospermum (Bremer and Humphries 1993). In addition, Oberprieler (2001), Oberprieler and Vogt (2006) and Lo Presti et al (2010) showed that Tripleurospermum is closely related to Anthemis in the strict sense and not to Matricaria.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 97%

Fruit structure of 12 Turkish endemic Tripleurospermum Sch. Bip. (Asteraceae) taxa and its taxonomic implications

et al. 2012

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study concerns the evaluation of micromorphological and anatomical characters of fruit (achenecypsela) in 12 Turkish endemic Tripleurospermum taxa using multivariate analyses (cluster analysis, principal component analysis, one-way analysis of variance). Pericarp in all taxa examined is mainly composed of several layers of parenchymatous and sclerenchymatous cells with one vascular bundle in each rib. In the achene, the thickness and width of lateral and adaxial ribs with presence or absence of a slime envelope have high taxonomic value for Tripleurospermum at interspecific levels. The slime envelope formation is also correlated with ploidy levels and habitats of some taxa in Tripleurospermum.

show abstract

“…(Kartesz and Kartesz 1980); scentless chamomile (Alex et al 1980), scentless mayweed, barnyard daisy, corn feverfew, wild chamomile, false chamomile, false mayweed, bachelor's button; matricaire inodore (Alex et al 1980). Asteraceae, composite family, Ast6r-ac6es: tribe Anthemideae. The nomenclature of Matricaria perforata is historically complex, and for simplicity, the taxonomic treatment by Rauschert (1974) Rauschert) specimen as he apparently intended. The subsequent attempts by him and others to revise the typifications have resulted in confusion over the specific epithets.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The subsequent attempts by him and others to revise the typifications have resulted in confusion over the specific epithets. Rauschert (1974) concludes that the only unambiguous and legitimate name that can be applied to scentless chamomile is Matricaria perforata M€rat. This revision is accepted by various authors, either fully (Kay 1976;Halliday and Beadle 1983;Hanf 1983) or in part (Kartesz and (Woo 1989).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%