2020
DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2020.1720280
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nomogram predicting cancer-specific survival in elderly patients with stages I–III colon cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides, the difference between MCC/SRCC, being considered highly malignant, and adenocarcinomas was non-significant. In addition, age, marital status, and pathological grade were also related to the survival of small bowel cancer, which was consistent with colorectal cancer (19)(20)(21)(22).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Besides, the difference between MCC/SRCC, being considered highly malignant, and adenocarcinomas was non-significant. In addition, age, marital status, and pathological grade were also related to the survival of small bowel cancer, which was consistent with colorectal cancer (19)(20)(21)(22).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…The current nomogram had certain advantages and key features compared with previous nomograms for resectable colon cancer. First, the present population was not age-restricted, compared with some studies that only included elderly patients 14 or younger patients. 11 In addition, some previous studies only performed internal validation, 15 while we validated the nomogram using both internal and external datasets, given that validation using a dataset from other countries is generally considered as the most stringent form of external validation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous studies, some prognostic factors for CC patients were reported, including stage and metastatic status, which revealed the association between clinicopathologic features and the prognosis of CC patients (11)(12)(13)(14). Nevertheless, there is no large cohort-based study in exploring prognostic factors of CCLM patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%