2022
DOI: 10.1007/jhep01(2022)137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-Abelian electric field correlator at NLO for dark matter relic abundance and quarkonium transport

Abstract: We perform a complete next-to-leading order calculation of the non-Abelian electric field correlator in a SU(Nc) plasma, which encodes properties of the plasma relevant for heavy particle bound state formation and dissociation, and is different from the correlator for the heavy quark diffusion coefficient. The calculation is carried out in the real-time formalism of thermal field theory and includes both vacuum and finite temperature contributions. By working in the Rξ gauge, we explicitly show the results are… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
72
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 120 publications
(174 reference statements)
3
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the 1s ground state our result agrees with [26], and for the 2s state with [29,30]. The result for 2p differs from the one given in [29,30] (by a factor 3 for the s-wave contribution with = 0, and a factor 3/2 for the d-wave with = 2, but matches the result for hydrogen when translated to the electromagnetic case [36].…”
Section: A Ionization and Recombinationsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…For the 1s ground state our result agrees with [26], and for the 2s state with [29,30]. The result for 2p differs from the one given in [29,30] (by a factor 3 for the s-wave contribution with = 0, and a factor 3/2 for the d-wave with = 2, but matches the result for hydrogen when translated to the electromagnetic case [36].…”
Section: A Ionization and Recombinationsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…In this region, the zerotemperature correction dominates. This is the reason why the difference between LO and the NLO correction considered in [30] is moderate in the right part of the left panel in Fig. 9.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations