2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.cep.2015.07.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-alkaline solubilization of arabinoxylans from destarched wheat bran using hydrothermal microwave processing and comparison with the hydrolysis by an endoxylanase

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, dilute alkaline solutions such as hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) have been used to extract WUAX, resulting in yields of around 69% of the total AXs content, from wheat bran [148,171]. Although alkaline extraction yield is higher than the water extraction, alkaline extraction has been reported to affect the molecular structure of AXs due to the disruption of cross-linkages, resulting in different molecular structures in WUAX than that would occur naturally, which in turn results in different functional characteristics [172,173]. The extraction yields of AXs and hemicelluloses using different alkaline solutions from rice and wheat brans are shown in Table 3.…”
Section: Alkaline Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, dilute alkaline solutions such as hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) have been used to extract WUAX, resulting in yields of around 69% of the total AXs content, from wheat bran [148,171]. Although alkaline extraction yield is higher than the water extraction, alkaline extraction has been reported to affect the molecular structure of AXs due to the disruption of cross-linkages, resulting in different molecular structures in WUAX than that would occur naturally, which in turn results in different functional characteristics [172,173]. The extraction yields of AXs and hemicelluloses using different alkaline solutions from rice and wheat brans are shown in Table 3.…”
Section: Alkaline Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As biomass pretreatment is considered as an initial and crucial step to enhance lignocellulose enzymatic hydrolysis, various pretreatments have been applied using physical, chemical and biological approaches. For instance, hot water, steam explosion, and hydrothermal microwave have been used as physical pretreatments in different biomass materials [23][24][25]. Alkalis (NaOH, CaO, NH 3 •H 2 O), acids (H 2 SO 4 , H 3 PO 4 ) and ionic liquids are broadly applied as effective chemical pretreatments.…”
Section: Biomass Digestibility In Four Cereal Cropsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The biomass digestibility (saccharification) could be detected by measuring either hexoses yield (% cellulose) released from hydrolysis by a crude cellulase mixture of lignocellulose after pretreatment or total sugars yield (% dry matter) released from both enzymatic hydrolysis and pretreatment [28,29]. Due to their diverse cell wall compositions and features, the four cereal crops exhibit great variation of hexoses yields released from enzymatic hydrolysis after chemical pretreatments (Table 3) [23][24][25]. As a comparison, several biomass samples of rice and sweet sorghum could be completely degraded from 4% NaOH pretreatments, whereas wheat and maize samples show relatively low biomass saccharification.…”
Section: Biomass Digestibility In Four Cereal Cropsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose of physical pretreatments are to increase the accessible specific surface area of lignocellulosic materials to enzymes via diminishing of biomass particle size or disrupting their structural regularity [136][137][138][139]. Size reduction not only increases the specific surface area of biomass but also reduces cellulose DP and Crl, but it depends on biomass compositions [140][141][142][143][144][145][146][147][148][149][150][151][152].…”
Section: Physical Pretreatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%