Non-aviation revenues and their implications for airport regulation

Kratzsch, Uwe; Sieg, Gernot

doi:10.1016/j.tre.2011.02.010

Cited by 25 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This indicates that diversifying revenue sources into commercial and other non-aeronautical business would greatly help to subsidize the fee charged to the aeronautical side. This finding supports the demand complementarities between aeronautical and commercial service suggested by Kratzsch andSieg (2011), Oum et al (2004) and Starkie (2001Starkie ( , 2002. In fact, Zhang and Zhang (1997) asserted that from a social welfare point of view, optimal airport pricing should include revenue from concessions.…”

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 72%

Factors affecting aeronautical charges at major US airports

Choo

2014

Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 72%

Factors affecting aeronautical charges at major US airports

Choo

2014

Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The first step considers the aerotropolis qualities that are widely believed be relevant. From a review of numerous articles discussing aerotropolises (e.g., Kasarda 2005Kasarda , 2006Kasarda , 2014Stevens et al 2010;Hong 2011;Freestone et al 2011;Skouloudis et al 2012;Yeo et al 2013;Kratzsch, Sieg 2011), 26 significant factors were identified and classified in four dimensions, each with six to eight factors. After consulting with three experts (one from Taoyuan International Airport Corporation, one from Taoyuan Aerotropolis Company, and one from the Taiwan government), we modi-fied and added some factors to reflect the particular details of the operational environment in Taiwan.…”

Section: Identify Factors For Developing the Aerotropolismentioning

confidence: 99%

Developing a Successful Aerotropolis by Using a Hybrid Model Under Information Uncertainty

Liou

Hsu

et al. 2018

Technological and Economic Development of Economy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Many airports are being expanded from transportation centers to economic hubs. This new type of urban area has been termed the aerotropolis or airport metropolis and is meant to function as an economic center with land-use that link local and global markets. However, to find the optimal means for developing an aerotropolis requires additional research, particularly from the viewpoint of long-term public policy and planning. In this study, a multiple criteria decision making model was applied to explore the key factors for successfully building an aerotropolis. We first applied the Decision-making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory based Analytical Network Process to construct the complex system and influential weights. A modified VIKOR method was then utilized to explore the gaps between the aspiration levels and the current situation. In addition, considering the uncertainty of decision-makers, fuzzy theory was integrated into the model. Data from the Taoyuan Aerotropolis in Taiwan were used to demonstrate this method. The results indicate that internationalization is the most crucial factor within the system, and that administrative efficiency has the highest degree of net influence. The largest weighted gap to the examined aspiration level is adequate regulation. Management implications are provided in the discussion.

show abstract

“…Starting from the previously outlined theoretical framework of economic regulation, and taking due account of information obtained through in-depth interviewing of a number of relevant actors 16 , let us now consider in greater detail the desired duration of the regulated period, the transition to dual till, the determination of the tariff formula, the level of regulation, and the role of the economic regulator.…”

Section: Regulation Of Brussels Airport Company 15mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…rail) or via other airports 13. For further clarification and argumentation see Kratzsch and Sieg[16].…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Economic regulation of airports: The case of Brussels Airport Company

Kupfer

Meersman

Pauwels

et al. 2013

Case Studies on Transport Policy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper considers the economic regulation of airports, with particular focus on the case of Brussels Airport Company (BAC). The foundation of the existing regulatory framework for BAC is called into question. At no point is BAC able to exert the kind market power normally associated with a 'natural monopoly'. As a matter of fact, there are no indications whatsoever that the company holds a natural monopoly. It is nonetheless argued that supervision of BAC is necessary, albeit under a revised regulation. Highlights The paper considers the economic regulation of airports, focusing on Brussels Airport Company. The foundation of the existing regulatory framework is called into question. There are no indications that Brussels Airport Company holds a natural monopoly. It is argued that supervision of BAC is necessary, albeit under a revised regulation.

show abstract

Non-aviation revenues and their implications for airport regulation

Cited by 25 publications

References 22 publications

Factors affecting aeronautical charges at major US airports

Factors affecting aeronautical charges at major US airports

Developing a Successful Aerotropolis by Using a Hybrid Model Under Information Uncertainty

Economic regulation of airports: The case of Brussels Airport Company

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About