2017
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2921691
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-Banks and Lending Standards in Mortgage Markets. The Spillovers from Liquidity Regulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The three-way DID regression models also confirm that relative to the change for nondepository institutions, the share of FHA lending by CRA-regulated lenders has decreased more sharply in newly ineligible tracts (by −7.4 percentage points). This is not surprising because nondepository institutions, relative to CRA-regulated depository institutions, are more likely to specialize in FHA lending in recent years (Getey and Reher, 2017). Results suggest that nondepository institutions are more likely to originate more mortgages, a disproportionately large share of which are FHA loans, in response to the decreased lending by CRA-regulated lenders when a neighborhood loses its CRA eligibility status.…”
Section: Effects Of the Cra On Other Lending Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The three-way DID regression models also confirm that relative to the change for nondepository institutions, the share of FHA lending by CRA-regulated lenders has decreased more sharply in newly ineligible tracts (by −7.4 percentage points). This is not surprising because nondepository institutions, relative to CRA-regulated depository institutions, are more likely to specialize in FHA lending in recent years (Getey and Reher, 2017). Results suggest that nondepository institutions are more likely to originate more mortgages, a disproportionately large share of which are FHA loans, in response to the decreased lending by CRA-regulated lenders when a neighborhood loses its CRA eligibility status.…”
Section: Effects Of the Cra On Other Lending Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…With regards to mortgage lending, Buchak et al (2018) develop a quantitative model of mortgage lending suggesting that regulation accounts for roughly 60% of shadow bank growth. Similarly, Gete and Reher (2017) document how liquidity regulation has attracted non-banks and originate-to-sell lenders towards the FHA market.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%