1998
DOI: 10.13031/2013.17238
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-Destructive Measurement of Acidity, Soluble Solids, and Firmness of Jonagold Apples Using Nir-Spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
118
10
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 239 publications
(139 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
9
118
10
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The statistic parameters were summarised in Large difference indicates either too many latent variables or PCs are used or 'noise' is modelled. 48 The results obtained by PCR and PLS-2 methods using only 3 factors/PCs are quite similar to each other. This is clearly observed for both the loading (Fig.…”
Section: +supporting
confidence: 65%
“…The statistic parameters were summarised in Large difference indicates either too many latent variables or PCs are used or 'noise' is modelled. 48 The results obtained by PCR and PLS-2 methods using only 3 factors/PCs are quite similar to each other. This is clearly observed for both the loading (Fig.…”
Section: +supporting
confidence: 65%
“…A good model should have a low RMSEC, a low RMSEP, a high correlation coefficient, but also a small difference between RMSEC and RMSEP. A large difference indicates that too many latent variables (principal components) are used in the model and noise is modeled (Lammertyn et al, 1998). Figure 8 shows the total explained variance and root mean square error (a), and correlation coefficient and optimal numbers of principal components Although the RMSEP values of the second derivative dataset have increased (and hence decreased prediction accuracy) relative to the raw data, the difference was small (only about 2.5%).…”
Section: Analysis Of Savitzky-golay Second Derivative Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early stopping (ES) was employed to avoid the over-fitting problem. The quality of the calibration model was determined by the standard error of calibration (SEC), standard error of prediction (SEP) and the correlation coefficient (r) between the predicted and measured values (Lammertyn et al 1998). The SEC and SEP were defined by the following equations.…”
Section: (B) Neural Network (Nn)mentioning
confidence: 99%