2014
DOI: 10.1609/icaps.v24i1.13682
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-Deterministic Planning With Conditional Effects

Abstract: Recent advances in fully observable non-deterministic (FOND) planning have enabled new techniques for various applications, such as behaviour composition, among others. One key limitation of modern FOND planners is their lack of native support for conditional effects. In this paper we describe an extension to PRP, the current state of the art in FOND planning, that supports the generation of policies for domains with conditional effects and non-determinism. We present core modifications to the PRP planner for … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…STRIPS. We synthesize 49 action schemes from 13 domains (FD benchmarks 3 and PLANNING.DOMAINS [39], ranging from Gripper to Transport in Table 2). For each domain, examples are generated using 10 IPC instances and computing: (i), one random walk per instance of at most 50 steps with TARSKI [20] and (ii), solution plans for those instances with the LAMA [44] setting of FD [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…STRIPS. We synthesize 49 action schemes from 13 domains (FD benchmarks 3 and PLANNING.DOMAINS [39], ranging from Gripper to Transport in Table 2). For each domain, examples are generated using 10 IPC instances and computing: (i), one random walk per instance of at most 50 steps with TARSKI [20] and (ii), solution plans for those instances with the LAMA [44] setting of FD [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the meantime, the action-based planning community studied how to handle general nondeterminism quite extensively in the past years, following different approaches such as, for instance, reactive planning systems [4], deductive planning [45], model checking [20], and, especially, fully observable nondeterministic planning (FOND planning) [7,37,38,42]. However, these approaches to nondeterministic action-based planning do not support flexible plans and temporal uncertainty, and do not account for controllability issues.…”
Section: Limitations Of the Current Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addi- tion, approaches that generalize classical planning concepts to FOND planning are particularly related to our work. For example, conditional effects for FOND planning (Muise, McIlraith, and Belle 2014), or pattern databases (Mattmüller et al 2010).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%