2013
DOI: 10.1027/1614-2241/a000051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-Graphical Solutions for Cattell’s Scree Test

Abstract: Most of the strategies that have been proposed to determine the number of components that account for the most variation in a principal components analysis of a correlation matrix rely on the analysis of the eigenvalues and on numerical solutions. The Cattell’s scree test is a graphical strategy with a nonnumerical solution to determine the number of components to retain. Like Kaiser’s rule, this test is one of the most frequently used strategies for determining the number of components to retain. However, the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
263
0
10

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 314 publications
(276 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
263
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…The Optimal Coordinates seek to ascertain the localization of the factor through simulations, verifying whether the eigenvalues found in the simulations are greater than the actual eigenvalues, defining the number of values to extract. The Acceleration Factor, on the other hand, aims to ascertain the point at which the gradient of the curve has an abrupt and meaningful change, thus identifying the number of factors found prior to the "elbow" (Raiche et al, 2013). The graphic distribution (scree plot) of these values is shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Optimal Coordinates seek to ascertain the localization of the factor through simulations, verifying whether the eigenvalues found in the simulations are greater than the actual eigenvalues, defining the number of values to extract. The Acceleration Factor, on the other hand, aims to ascertain the point at which the gradient of the curve has an abrupt and meaningful change, thus identifying the number of factors found prior to the "elbow" (Raiche et al, 2013). The graphic distribution (scree plot) of these values is shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 'R' statistical program was used for analyzing the data (R Development Core Team, 2011;Raiche, Walls, Magis, Riopel, & Blais, 2013;van der Ark, 2012). Initially, the item of discrimination was evaluated, Student t tests were calculated, and descriptive analyses were undertaken.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To observe the number of components to be extracted, a PC analysis was conducted on five criteria: Kaiser values, Cattell criterion, parallel analysis, acceleration factor and optimal coordinates (Hayton, Allen, & Scarpello, 2004;Pasquali, 2010;Raiche, Walls, Magis, Riopel, & Blais, 2013). These analyses were performed using the Psych and nFactors statistical packages (Raiche & Magis, 2014;Revelle, 2014).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. Using the nFactors package [20] a variety of methods were employed in order to determine the number of dimensions to keep in further analysis, shown in Fig. 1.…”
Section: Principal Component Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kaiser's rule [21] suggests retaining those dimensions with eigenvalues greater than 1, which in this case was the first five components. The acceleration factor (AF) [20] determines the knee in the plot by examining the second derivative-this method would retain only the first dimension but is known to underestimate [22]. The optimal coordinates (OC) method [20] suggested that the first four dimensions be kept.…”
Section: Principal Component Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%