2016
DOI: 10.1007/s12686-016-0613-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-invasive bat species identification from mixed-species samples using a microarray

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The two markers identified by Zinck et al (2004) were recently applied to DNA from mixed guano samples collected in Canada and the northern United States using microarray technology, allowing for the genetic identification of 34 bat species (Patrick et al 2016). The sequences we present, along with those determined by Patrick et al (2016) and Zinck et al (2004), create a large 16S mtDNA sequence database that has broad application for bat-related research. This database and the genetic analysis techniques we employed will be useful to identify bat species in areas where, as a result of WNSrelated declines or the cryptic nature of many bat species, roost surveys, mist netting, or acoustic monitoring are ineffective.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The two markers identified by Zinck et al (2004) were recently applied to DNA from mixed guano samples collected in Canada and the northern United States using microarray technology, allowing for the genetic identification of 34 bat species (Patrick et al 2016). The sequences we present, along with those determined by Patrick et al (2016) and Zinck et al (2004), create a large 16S mtDNA sequence database that has broad application for bat-related research. This database and the genetic analysis techniques we employed will be useful to identify bat species in areas where, as a result of WNSrelated declines or the cryptic nature of many bat species, roost surveys, mist netting, or acoustic monitoring are ineffective.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When bat species are rare, elusive, or share similar morphological or call characteristics, species identification using genetic markers from fecal material (i.e., guano) found in or around roost locations (i.e., caves, trees, and buildings) may provide an alternative indicator of occurrence (Patrick et al 2016;Walker et al 2016;Zinck et al 2004) identified two genetic markers from 16S ribosomal subunit, mitochondrial deoxyribonucleic acid (mtDNA), for bat species identification using fecal DNA and applied this marker to DNA extracted from guano of bats found in the northwestern United States. Only 5 of the 14 species sequenced by Zinck et al (2004) are found in the southeastern United States: Rafinesque's big-eared bat Corynorhinus townsendii, big brown bat Eptesicus fuscus, silver-haired bat Lasionycteris noctivagans, hoary bat Lasiurus cinereus, and little brown myotis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%