2022
DOI: 10.1186/s12984-022-01062-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-invasive brain stimulation for improving gait, balance, and lower limbs motor function in stroke

Abstract: Objectives This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to summarize and analyze the available evidence of non-invasive brain stimulation/spinal cord stimulation on gait, balance and/or lower limb motor recovery in stroke patients. Methods The PubMed database was searched from its inception through to 31/03/2021 for randomized controlled trials investigating repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation or transcranial/trans-spinal direct current/al… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
45
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
2
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although a general examination of mobility-based characteristics ( Table 1 ) may be useful for an initial fall risk assessment with current IMU approaches, stratifying characteristics according to conceptual models ( Figure 1 ) may be more helpful to better understand discrete cognitive functions [ 30 ] and the effectiveness of targeted interventions [ 31 ]. Table 2 stratifies all mobility-based gait characteristics according to a free-living conceptual model [ 20 ], the use of which may enable more sensitive methods to better identify the use of a targeted intervention [ 32 ], particularly when the associated environmental context is known.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a general examination of mobility-based characteristics ( Table 1 ) may be useful for an initial fall risk assessment with current IMU approaches, stratifying characteristics according to conceptual models ( Figure 1 ) may be more helpful to better understand discrete cognitive functions [ 30 ] and the effectiveness of targeted interventions [ 31 ]. Table 2 stratifies all mobility-based gait characteristics according to a free-living conceptual model [ 20 ], the use of which may enable more sensitive methods to better identify the use of a targeted intervention [ 32 ], particularly when the associated environmental context is known.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One could argue that NIBS could also have positive effects when coupled with conventional therapy. Actually, several works assessed NIBS coupled with conventional physiotherapy as compared to stand-alone for either upper or lower limbs, showing the coupled intervention as an effective strategy to improve motor function recovery in post-stroke patients [ 2 , 87 ]. No studies directly compared RAR, NIBS, and conventional physiotherapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include early reperfusion therapies (i.e., intravenous thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy) aimed at limiting damage and preventing further cell death to contain lesion size and disability [ 1 ]. Furthermore, traditional (neurofacilitation or functional retraining through either shaping or task practice) and advanced rehabilitation protocols, including pharmacological manipulation to increase sprouting and anatomical plasticity, non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) to modulate the activity of targeted brain areas, and robot-aided rehabilitation (RAR) to perform an intensive, repetitive, assisted-as-needed, and task-oriented motor practice, are available in any phase of the post-stroke recovery process [ 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 ]. These rehabilitation strategies aim to increase the adaptive plasticity processes (mainly experience-dependent plasticity mechanisms) that develop in lesional and perilesional tissues [ 10 , 11 , 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, their effects were not always favorable, and they seem to be influenced by the type of protocol used [21,28] or by the heterogenous capacity of individuals to induce M1 plasticity, both in healthy and poststroke-treated patients [30][31][32]. Regarding protocols, a meta-analysis on 445 stroke patients evidenced that bilateral transcranial electric stimulation and cathodal tDCS over the contralesional hemisphere were superior to other stimulation montages/patterns/protocols [33]. Promising results were also obtained with different protocols of NIBS applied to poststroke survivors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%