2021
DOI: 10.3390/jcm10204712
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-Invasive Evaluation of Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Chronic Total Occlusion

Abstract: Background: As percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic total occlusion (CTO) gains wider acceptance as a therapeutic option for coronary artery disease, the importance of appropriate patient selection has increased. Although cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) allows segmental and quantitative analyses of myocardial ischemia and scar transmurality, it has limitations, including contraindications, cost, and accessibility. This study established a non-invasive method to evaluate patients… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was consistent with Benha Journal Of Applied Sciences, Vol. ( 8) Issue (1) (2023( the findings of (24) (24,2006), who reported (66%) of his cases in the upper breast quadrants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This was consistent with Benha Journal Of Applied Sciences, Vol. ( 8) Issue (1) (2023( the findings of (24) (24,2006), who reported (66%) of his cases in the upper breast quadrants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Follow-up testing after PCI has been broadly acted in true clinical practice to recognize in-stent restenosis, albeit randomized controlled examinations have not confirmed the viability of routine subsequent testing after PCI for asymptomatic patients. In the USA, the suitable use rules arranged non-invasive subsequent testing as seldom fitting in no less than two years after PCI and in something like five years after coronary vein sidestep uniting (CABG), except if upon the presence of ischemic side effects (Nakachi et al, 2021). In the contemporary PCI practice, the number of patients with severe CAD requiring revascularization but at high procedural risk owing to patient comorbidities, complexity of coronary anatomy, and/or poor hemodynamics has substantially increased.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%