2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2009.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-invasive measurements of intralabyrinthine pressure changes by electrocochleography and otoacoustic emissions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Evidence to support this second hypothesis is that OAEs are sensitive to positional changes, specifically in the low frequencies (de Kleine et al 2001; Voss et al 2006). However, previous reports documenting changes in OAE, ECoG, and oVEMP in response to postural changes have been limited to ACS stimuli (Buki et al 2009; de Kleine et al 2001; Jerin and Gürkov 2014; Voss et al 2006). In the present study, equal reduction in oVEMP amplitude regardless of stimulus type (ACS versus midline taps, Table 1), was found, suggesting that in addition to the cochlea, increased intralabyrinthine pressure may directly affect sensory structures in the vestibular system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Evidence to support this second hypothesis is that OAEs are sensitive to positional changes, specifically in the low frequencies (de Kleine et al 2001; Voss et al 2006). However, previous reports documenting changes in OAE, ECoG, and oVEMP in response to postural changes have been limited to ACS stimuli (Buki et al 2009; de Kleine et al 2001; Jerin and Gürkov 2014; Voss et al 2006). In the present study, equal reduction in oVEMP amplitude regardless of stimulus type (ACS versus midline taps, Table 1), was found, suggesting that in addition to the cochlea, increased intralabyrinthine pressure may directly affect sensory structures in the vestibular system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In patients with increased ICP secondary to hydrocephalus, intracranial tumors, etc, differences in tympanic membrane displacement during stapedial reflex testing were noted when compared to individuals with normal ICP (Reid et al 1990). OAEs, electrocochleography (ECoG), and recently oVEMP have also been measured in normal subjects after being placed on an inversion table (Buki et al 2000; Buki et al 2009; de Kleine et al 2000; de Kleine et al 2001; Deppe et al 2013; Jerin and Gürkov 2014; Voss et al 2006). ICP increases as a result of inversion, and because of the cochlear and vestibular aqueducts, intralabyrinthine pressure is increased in response to rises in ICP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations