2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2005.08.079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-linear, rate-dependent strain-hardening behavior of polymer glasses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
112
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(48 reference statements)
6
112
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The experimental literature offers conflicting results on the rate dependence of strain hardening. Some experiments 6,16,39 show rate-dependent hardening, while others 37,50 do not. Most experiments are fit to additive constitutive laws like eq 11, but a multiplicative form like eq 10 has also been employed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The experimental literature offers conflicting results on the rate dependence of strain hardening. Some experiments 6,16,39 show rate-dependent hardening, while others 37,50 do not. Most experiments are fit to additive constitutive laws like eq 11, but a multiplicative form like eq 10 has also been employed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A plurality of the experiments 7,15,16,30,31 most relevant to the present study have employed uniaxial compression; we therefore do the same. The systems are compressed along one direction, z, while maintaining zero stresses along the transverse (x, y) directions.…”
Section: Polymer Model and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Most viscoelastic and viscoplastic constitutive models that describe strain hardening, e. g. Refs. [26,27], decompose λ into rubber-elastic and plastic parts, or use other internal state variables, but do not explicitly account for λ = λ ef f or the N -dependence of nonaffine relaxation [28]. In this paper we do so; λ ef f is treated as a mesoscopic (chain-level) internal state variable [28].…”
Section: A Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%