1996
DOI: 10.1088/0029-5515/36/12/i09
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-local component of electron heat transport in TFTR

Abstract: The electron temperature profile response in ohmically heated Tokamak Fusion Test Reactor (TFTR) discharges to temporally and spatially sharp edge cooling from laser ablation of trace impurities is studied. The profile response is found to exhibit transport behaviour which cannot be described by transport coefficients that depend solely on local parameters. Thus, the transport behaviour is 'non-local'. This non-local behaviour manifests itself as a core electron temperature rise in response to localized edge c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

9
101
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
9
101
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Following the edge cooling, there was a rapid increase of the core electron temperature, on a time scale (∼5 ms) faster than the diffusive time. This effect is suggestive of a short-lived internal transport barrier (ITB), triggered by the sudden increase of the edge temperature gradient, which can be modeled with an abrupt drop in the core electron thermal conductivity [19,20,21,23,24,25,27], and which persists for the duration of the edge cooling (∼30 ms). A model for this transient increase in electron heat transport (a drop in thermal conductivity) is shown in Fig.3, with a 25% drop in χ e near r/a = 0.3 (solid to dash-dot lines).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the edge cooling, there was a rapid increase of the core electron temperature, on a time scale (∼5 ms) faster than the diffusive time. This effect is suggestive of a short-lived internal transport barrier (ITB), triggered by the sudden increase of the edge temperature gradient, which can be modeled with an abrupt drop in the core electron thermal conductivity [19,20,21,23,24,25,27], and which persists for the duration of the edge cooling (∼30 ms). A model for this transient increase in electron heat transport (a drop in thermal conductivity) is shown in Fig.3, with a 25% drop in χ e near r/a = 0.3 (solid to dash-dot lines).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(II) The sign of the perturbation reverses, i.e., a cooling at the edge results in heating of the core, and vice versa. Such evidence has accumulated through dedicated experiments, including edge cooling by laser blowoff (LBO) of impurities, pellets, radio frequency (RF) heating, and plasma current ramping, performed in several devices, including tokamaks and stellarators [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. The ubiquity of these phenomena calls naturally for some common fundamental physics basis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the parameters (A, r S , w S , τ, χ n , χ p ) not a priori known are varied until a good match between the numerical T and experimental traces is obtained. We carried out this exercise for data from the experiments TEXT [3], TFTR [6], RTP [7], ASDEX-Upgrade [8], Tore Supra [9], LHD [14], and JET [17]. Extensive results are given in the Supplemental Material [23], while we provide details here for a few.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many kinds of peculiar non-local transport phenomena have been reported by both tokamak and helical experiments [1][2][3][4][5][6]. For example, an edge cooling perturbation can cause the core electron temperature to start increasing under certain conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%