1994
DOI: 10.1016/0165-0114(94)90008-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-monotonic fuzzy measures and the Choquet integral

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
73
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 194 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yan, Wang and Chen [55] tackle a quite similar problem, albeit using another optimization criterion (which can be seen as a kind of relaxed class separability criterion). Besides, the authors define the Choquet integral based on a so-called signed non-additive measure [41].…”
Section: The Choquet Integral In Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yan, Wang and Chen [55] tackle a quite similar problem, albeit using another optimization criterion (which can be seen as a kind of relaxed class separability criterion). Besides, the authors define the Choquet integral based on a so-called signed non-additive measure [41].…”
Section: The Choquet Integral In Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The monotonicity and non-negativity of the fuzzy measure are too restrictive to apply for more problems. Thus, the signed fuzzy measure, which is a generalization of the fuzzy measure, has been defined (Murofushi et al, 1994;Grabisch et al, 2000) and adopted.…”
Section: Fuzzy Measurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aggregated Sustainability Index is constructed through a non-linear aggregation methodology, the Choquet integral, which accounts for the possible interactions among sustainability indicators (see Murofushi and Soneda 1993;Murofushi et al 1994;Grabisch 1995Grabisch , 1996Marichal and Roubens 2000;Grabisch et al 2003 for the detailed Choquet integral aggregation procedure and its characteristics). 5 For the aggregation, the decision tree should be read from bottom (leaves) to top (final node) and the tree respects the three main pillar structure which is quite standard in most sustainability studies (see e.g., UN CSD 2005; Global Reporting Initiative framework, GRI 2006GRI , 2010Krajnc and Glavic 2005), with the final node producing the aggregate index.…”
Section: Normalisation and Aggregation Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%