2022
DOI: 10.1111/rssa.12827
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-Participation in Smartphone Data Collection Using Research Apps

Abstract: Research apps allow to administer survey questions and passively collect smartphone data, thus providing rich information on individual and social behaviours. Agreeing to this novel form of data collection requires multiple consent steps, and little is known about the effect of non-participation. We invited 4,293 Android smartphone owners from the German Panel Study Labour Market and Social Security (PASS) to download the IAB-SMART app. The app collected data over six months through (a) short in-app surveys an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Non-response bias, which is defined as differences between responders and those who choose not to participate, makes it difficult to effectively represent non-participants' opinions. To retain the validity of their studies, researchers dealing with the complexity of non-participation must actively address non-response bias (Keusch et al, 2022). To examine non-response bias, many methods are often used, such as analysing identified characteristics, examining non-responder subsamples, wave analysis, and linear extrapolation (Al-Sabi et al, 2024).…”
Section: Checking Missing Value and Dealing With Non-response Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-response bias, which is defined as differences between responders and those who choose not to participate, makes it difficult to effectively represent non-participants' opinions. To retain the validity of their studies, researchers dealing with the complexity of non-participation must actively address non-response bias (Keusch et al, 2022). To examine non-response bias, many methods are often used, such as analysing identified characteristics, examining non-responder subsamples, wave analysis, and linear extrapolation (Al-Sabi et al, 2024).…”
Section: Checking Missing Value and Dealing With Non-response Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A major limitation of existing studies, however, is that participation rates are rather low. The IAB-SMART study, for example, which recruited participants from a household panel survey of the residential population aged 15+ in Germany to measure the effects of long-term unemployment on social integration and social activity using a smartphone app, achieved a participation rate of only 14.5 percent ( Keusch et al 2022 ). Other smartphone-based studies in the general population reported participation rates in a similar range (e.g., Scherpenzeel 2017 ; Jäckle et al 2019 ; McCool et al 2021 ; Struminskaya et al 2021 ).…”
Section: Smartphone-based Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of qualitative studies investigated willingness to share commercial data, specifically loyalty cards for health research, echoing the principal evidence shared across disciplines, as discussed earlier [15,18,19]. In contrast, for mobile and biosensor data sharing, there is a growing body of literature on the importance of understanding nonparticipation and willingness to share mobile phone apps and biosensor data [20][21][22][23][24]. A study that took place in England before the GDPR highlighted that, in the context of mobile data sharing, user behavior is also associated with willingness to share passive or actively collected mobile data [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further experimental studies have highlighted the behavior of sharing mobile data, which requires capabilities from the users to fulfill the task and the characteristics of the individuals, framing of the request, emphasis on control over data, and assurances of privacy and confidentiality [ 22 ]. The implications of the willingness to share smartphone and sensor data with researchers are further understood in studies where the response rate for data sharing is less than 15%, and the representativeness of the population that shares the data is less than optimal [ 23 ]. This highlights the importance of understanding the characteristics of the population who are willing to share commercial data sets before data collection so that strategies can be developed to improve response rates and minimize bias.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%