“…While the scoring of handedness varied in strictness between articles, each article presented frequencies for abnormal (all versions of non-right) handedness, which allowed for the comparison of percent abnormal between diagnostic groups between studies. A total of 16 articles fulfilled our selection criteria, with some articles reporting data for multiple handedness categories (3 non-right: O’Callaghan et al, 1995; Sperling et al, 1999; Yan et al, 1985; and 11 left: Clementz, Iacono et al, 1994; Dragovic and Hammond, 2005; Egan, Hyde et al, 2001; Green, Satz, Smith et al, 1989; Lawrie et al, 1999a; Malesu et al, 1996; Nelson et al, 1993; Reilly et al, 2001; Shapleske et al, 2001; Taylor and Abrams, 1984; Upadhyay et al, 2004; and 10 mixed: Dragovic and Hammond, 2005; Egan, Hyde et al, 2001; Giotakos, 2001; Green, Satz, Smith et al, 1989; Gureje, 1988; Malesu et al, 1996; Nelson et al, 1993; Reilly et al, 2001; Taylor and Abrams, 1984; Upadhyay et al, 2004). Percent abnormal calculations are presented in Table 3.…”