Non-uniform dispersion of toughening agents and its influence on the mechanical properties of polypropylene

Abstract

Abstract. To achieve excellent properties of polymer blends and composites, good dispersion and uniform distribution of second component or filler in the matrix are often required. However, more and more evidences reveal that uniform distribution is not always the best. To further prove this idea, in this work, we purposely designed and prepared different samples of isotactic polypropylene (iPP)/elastomer or iPP/!-nucleating agent with uniform and non-uniform distribution of the modifiers via stacking the blending sheets in different sequence. It was found that for a given amount of toughening agent, the impact strength of polymer blends with non-uniform distribution of elastomer or !-nucleating agent could be much higher than its uniformly dispersed counterpart, while the tensile strength and tensile modulus remain relatively constant. The instrumented impact test confirmed that among the samples with different layered structures, the absorbed energy during crack initiation differs little from each other. Whereas absorbed energy during crack propagation process shows the same trend as final impact strength, making it the controlling parameter during the impact process. When cracks are initiated at higher toughening agents content side, the relatively smooth fracture surfaces near the crack edge area proved that they absorb small energy and the adjacent inner part showed obviously plastic deformation, corresponding to higher energy absorption. Our work demonstrates again that design and control of the hierarchical structure of polymer articles is vital for high performance properties and non-uniform distribution of filler could be much better than the uniform distribution.

Effects of SEBS-g-MA on Rheology, Morphology and Mechanical Properties of PET/HDPE Blends

“…If two immiscible polymers are mixed, that can result in two different types of morphological structures: a dispersed phase/matrix type or a co-continuous phase. However, it is a well-known fact that most polymers are not compatible with each other, thus a suitable copolymer or a compatibilizer is needed to achieve good miscibility between the phases (Jarukumjorn and Chareunkvun, 2006;Li et al, 2014). Introducing a third part into polymer blends could also reduce the size of the dispersed phase and provide a significant improvement in adhesion between the phases (Marosi, 2011;Zhang et al, 2004).…”

Hierarchic structure and mechanical property of glass fiber reinforced isotactic polypropylene composites molded by multiflow vibration injection molding

“…Another method is to enhance the properties of the matrix, which can be divided into 3 ways. (1) Adding elastomers (styrene–butadiene–styrene, ethylene–propylene–diene‐monomer, and styrene–ethylene–butylene–styrene) into the matrix . However, this method usually deteriorates the strength and the modulus .…”

In‐line characterization of dispersion uniformity evolution during a twin‐screw blending extrusion based on near‐infrared spectroscopy

“…Controlling the phase morphology, especially the dispersion uniformity of droplets, is one key factor to achieve desired properties. [1,2] During the twinscrew blending process, dispersion uniformity is dynamically changing due to the droplet breakup and coalescence. Therefore, understanding dispersion evolution is important for better control of the ultimate morphology.…”