1994
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1994.tb00162.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non‐uniform stomatal closure and the apparent convexity of the photosynthetic photon flux density response curve

Abstract: The photosynthetic response of leaves to photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) may be described by parameters for the rate of dark respiration (R), the initial slope (Ф), the PPFD‐saturated rate of net photosynthesis (AmQ) and the apparent convexity (θa). We tested the hypothesis that non‐uniformity in stomatal aperture across a leaf results in a clearly lower θa because PPFD saturation will occur at different irradiances in different regions of the leaf. A computer model was constructed to simulate the ef… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dark respiration (R) was measured after each curve. Maximum carboxylation (Vc max ), estimates of the maximum rate of ribulose 1,5 bisphosphate regeneration (J max ), triose phosphate utilization (TPU), and CO 2 compensation point (Γ) were calculated from the biochemical model of Farquhar et al [9], following the subsequent modifications of Sharkey [30], Harley and Sharkey [13], and Harley et al [14]. Abbreviations after the species represent glasshouse (gl), and field (fd) conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Dark respiration (R) was measured after each curve. Maximum carboxylation (Vc max ), estimates of the maximum rate of ribulose 1,5 bisphosphate regeneration (J max ), triose phosphate utilization (TPU), and CO 2 compensation point (Γ) were calculated from the biochemical model of Farquhar et al [9], following the subsequent modifications of Sharkey [30], Harley and Sharkey [13], and Harley et al [14]. Abbreviations after the species represent glasshouse (gl), and field (fd) conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model estimated the maximum rate of carboxylation (Vc max ), the maximum rate of ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate regeneration (assumed to equal the maximum rate of coupled photosynthetic electron transport) (J max ), and the CO 2 compensation point by the biochemical model of Farquhar et al [12], following the subsequent modifications of Sharkey [36], Harley and Sharkey [17], and Harley et al [18]. Carboxylation efficiency (CE) was estimated by least-squares regression [30]. Nonlinear regression techniques for estimating Vc max , J max , and triose phosphate utilization (TPU) followed Wullschleger [40].…”
Section: Leaf Gas Exchangementioning
confidence: 99%
“…50 mol mol ¡1 and increased stepwise to 1,000 mol mol ¡1 in 12 steps (50,100,150,200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700, 800, 900 and 1,000 mol mol ¡1 ). Net photosynthesis versus C i curves over the range of 0-150 mol mol ¡1 was determined, and the regressions of CO 2 and P n were used to determine the CO 2 compensation point ( ) and carboxylation eYciency (CE; Olsson and Leverenz 1994).…”
Section: ¡1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The regressions of P n versus C i curves (range from 0 to 200 lmol mol À1 ) were used to determine the CO 2 compensation point (CP) and carboxylation efficiency (CE) as described by Olsson and Leverenz (1994). The photosynthesis curve plotted against C i (P n /C i curve) was analyzed to estimate the maximum rate of RuBP carboxylation (V cmax ) and the maximum rate of electron transport driving regeneration of RuBP (J max ) as described by Long and Bernacchi (2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%