2017
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.96.043845
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonclassicality and entanglement criteria for bipartite optical fields characterized by quadratic detectors

Abstract: Numerous inequalities involving moments of integrated intensities and revealing nonclassicality and entanglement in bipartite optical fields are derived using the majorization theory, non-negative polynomials, the matrix approach, as well as the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality. Different approaches for deriving these inequalities are compared. Using the experimental photocount histogram generated by a weak noisy twin beam monitored by a photon-number-resolving iCCD camera the performance of the derived inequalities … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
55
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important to note that the NWs in Eqs. (10) and (11) can be used for the detection of nonclassicality for any kind of state of light, i.e., even for non-Gaussian states since the negativity of these NWs refers to nonclassical properties of the quasidistribution Glauber-Sudarshan P function [4, 21,38]. But they become optimal for complete nonclassicality detection only for Gaussian states.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to note that the NWs in Eqs. (10) and (11) can be used for the detection of nonclassicality for any kind of state of light, i.e., even for non-Gaussian states since the negativity of these NWs refers to nonclassical properties of the quasidistribution Glauber-Sudarshan P function [4, 21,38]. But they become optimal for complete nonclassicality detection only for Gaussian states.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initially, such studies were restricted to the lower-order nonclassical features. In the recent past, various higher-order nonclassical features have been predicted theoretically [38][39][40][41][42] and confirmed experimentally ( [43,44] and references therein) in quantum states generated in nonlinear optical processes. (ii) Phase properties of the nonclassical states have been studied [45] by computing quantum phase fluctuations, phase dispersion, phase distribution functions, etc., under various formalisms, like Susskind and Glogower [46], Pegg-Barnett [47] and Barnett-Pegg [48] formalisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…To monitor the performance of the noise reduction in the suggested reconstruction method, we need to quan-tify (quantum) correlations between the signal and idler fields both for the experimental photocounts and reconstructed photon numbers. Here, we show that the non-classicality depths τ [32] determined for the nonclassicality identifiers E k , k = 2, 3, 4, defined in terms of intensity moments W l as [33]…”
Section: Quantifiers Useful For Monitoring the Level Of Noise Rementioning
confidence: 81%
“…We note that an l-th intensity moment W l is related to the moments c k of photocounts by the formula W l = l k=1 S −1 lk c k that uses the Stirling numbers S lk of the second kind. We remind that a nonclassicality depth τ is given by the number of thermal photons needed to conceal nonclassical properties of an optical field visible in a given non-classicality identifier [33]. For comparison, we also determine the traditional covariance C ∆c of fluctuations of the numbers c s and c i of the signal and idler photocounts and sub-shot-noise parameter R c ,…”
Section: Quantifiers Useful For Monitoring the Level Of Noise Rementioning
confidence: 99%