2003
DOI: 10.1017/s0263574702004538
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noncollocated passivity-based PD control of a single-link flexible manipulator

Abstract: The passivity property of a noncollocated single-link flexible manipulator with a parameterized output is studied. The system can be characterized by either the irrational transfer function of an infinite-dimensional model or its truncated rational transfer functions. Necessary and sufficient conditions for these transfer functions to be passive are found. It is also shown that a non-passive, marginal minimum-phase, truncated transfer function can be rendered passive by using either the root strain feedback or… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(48 reference statements)
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…passive and robust control theories) to obtain a controller more adequate and versatile to do a determined control task, as a consequence of its easy implementation. Classic control techniques are more convenient when minimum phase systems are used (see discussions of ), which can be obtained by choosing an appropriate output ( (Gervarter, 1970), (Luo, 1993) and (Pereira et al, 2007)) or by redefining it ( (Wang & Vidyasagar 1992) and (Liu & Yuan, 2003)). …”
Section: Classic Control Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…passive and robust control theories) to obtain a controller more adequate and versatile to do a determined control task, as a consequence of its easy implementation. Classic control techniques are more convenient when minimum phase systems are used (see discussions of ), which can be obtained by choosing an appropriate output ( (Gervarter, 1970), (Luo, 1993) and (Pereira et al, 2007)) or by redefining it ( (Wang & Vidyasagar 1992) and (Liu & Yuan, 2003)). …”
Section: Classic Control Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, a number of techniques for vibration control of flexible structures have been used, including observer-based control [3], potential difference (PD) control [4], adaptive boundary control [5]- [8], input preshaping approach [9], and adaptive control [2]. However, these traditional control approaches mentioned above are difficult to track the desired angle and suppress the vibration simultaneously, since the flexible manipulator is assumed to be distributed into a number of units with the absence of velocity sensors for every separated mode.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4,2] T , and = 0.001. The initial values of the observer are set as π 1 = π 2 =π 1 =π 2 = [0, 0] T .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actually, the noncollocated design has been widely used in engineering systems control (see e.g. Cannon and Schmitz 1984;Spector and Flashner 1990;Udwadia 1991;Yang and Mote 1992;Liu and Yuan 1997;Wu 2001;de Querioz and Rhan 2002;Ryu, Kwon, and Hannsford 2003;Yuan and Liu 2003;Lacarbonara and Yabuno 2004). But non-collocated control design proposes some theoretical challenges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%