2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.12.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noncontiguous and open fractures of the lower extremity: Epidemiology, complications, and unplanned procedures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
8

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
15
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, rehospitalizations are relatively common, suggesting that failure to heal is still a significant problem. Lower extremity injuries, specifically, are also associated with high rates of delayed amputation and hospitalization …”
Section: Current Burden and Treatment Of Extremity Traumamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, rehospitalizations are relatively common, suggesting that failure to heal is still a significant problem. Lower extremity injuries, specifically, are also associated with high rates of delayed amputation and hospitalization …”
Section: Current Burden and Treatment Of Extremity Traumamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Closed and Gustilo type-I open fractures have lowest rate of infection (1.8%), while severe high energy lower extremity open fractures have highest occurrence of infection (27%), with the tibia being the most commonly affected. [11][12][13][14][15] The overall incidence of bone infection may continue to rise due to multiple factors including improved diagnosis, increasing patient risk factors (i.e. diabetes), and increased needs for arthroplasties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prime objectives of treatment of open fractures of distal tibia are the prevention of infection, promotion of soft tissue healing, stabilization of fracture and restoration of function of affected extremity. 9,10,11,12 A good surgical debridement is of paramount importance in eliminating the chances of infection. Primary internal fixation is preferred wherever possible in preventing malunion and early mobilization and return to activities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%