Bioactive glass is used as both a bone filler and as a coating on implants, and has been advocated as a potential osteogenic scaffold for tissue engineering. Rat-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) show elevated levels of alkaline phosphatase activity when grown on 45S5 bioactive glass as compared to standard tissue culture plastic. Similarly, exposure to the dissolution products of 45S5 elevates alkaline phosphatase activity and other osteogenic markers in these cells. We investigated whether human MSCs grown under the same laboratory conditions as rat MSCs would exhibit similar responses. In general, human MSCs produce markedly less alkaline phosphatase activity than rat MSCs, regardless of cell culture conditions, and do not respond to the growth factor BMP-2 in the same way as rat MSCs. In our experiments there was no difference in alkaline phosphatase activity between human MSCs grown on 45S5 bioactive glass or tissue culture plastic, in samples from five different orthopaedic patients, regardless of culture media composition. Neither was there any consistent effect of 45S5 dissolution products on human MSCs from three different donors. These results suggest that the positive effects of bioactive glass on bone growth in human patients are not mediated by accelerated differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells.
Introduction: National trends reveal increased transfers to referral hospitals for surgical management of pediatric supracondylar humerus (SCH) fractures. This is partly because of the belief that pediatric orthopaedic surgeons (POs) deliver improved outcomes compared with nonpediatric orthopaedic surgeons (NPOs). We compared early outcomes of surgically treated SCH fractures between POs and NPOs at a single center where both groups manage these fractures. Methods: Patients ages 3 to 10 undergoing surgery for SCH fractures from 2014 to 2020 were included. Patient demographics and perioperative details were recorded. Radiographs at surgery and short-term follow-up assessed reduction. Primary outcomes were major loss of reduction (MLOR) and iatrogenic nerve injury (INI). Complications were compared between PO-treated and NPO-treated cohorts. Results: Three hundred and eleven fractures were reviewed. POs managed 132 cases, and NPOs managed 179 cases. Rate of MLOR was 1.5% among POs and 2.2% among NPOs (P = 1). Rate of INI was 0% among POs and 3.4% among NPOs (P = 0.041). All nerve palsies resolved postoperatively by mean 13.1 weeks. Rates of reoperation, infection, readmission, and open reduction were not significantly different. Operative times were decreased among POs (38.1 vs. 44.6 min; P = 0.030). Pin constructs were graded as higher quality in the PO group, with a higher mean pin spread ratio (P = 0.029), lower rate of "C" constructs (only 1 "column" engaged; P = 0.010) and less frequent crossed-pin technique (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed minimal positive associations only for operative time with MLOR (odds ratio = 1.021; P = 0.005) and INI (odds ratio = 1.048; P = 0.009).Conclusions: Postsurgical outcomes between POs and NPOs were similar. Rates of MLOR were not different between groups, despite differences in pin constructs. The NPO group experienced a marginally higher rate of INI, though all injuries resolved. Pediatric subspecialty training is not a prerequisite for successfully treating SCH fractures, and overall value of orthopaedic care may be improved by decreasing transfers for these common injuries. Level of Evidence: Level III-retrospective cohort study.
Volunteer orthopedic surgical trips are cost-effective in Nicaragua. Further research should be conducted with multiple trips and with different patient populations to test the generalizability of the results.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.