2006
DOI: 10.1002/sia.2362
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nondestructive in‐depth composition profile of oxy‐hydroxide nanolayers on iron surfaces from ARXPS measurement

Abstract: In this work the maximum entropy method (MEM) is applied, for the first time, to angle-resolved X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (ARXPS) data from oxy-hydroxide films on iron surfaces. This nondestructively derives information on the in-depth distribution of the composition and chemical state. An MEM algorithm was created and first tested on the simulated data. The reconstructed composition depth profiles agreed very well with the theoretical ones up to 5% Gaussian noise added to the data. The same algorithm w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
51
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Secondary ion mass spectroscopy (SIMS) and depth profiling by Auger electron spectroscopy and XPS could provide an accurate estimate of the overlayer thickness, but these methods are destructive. Alternately, the overlayer thickness can be determined non-destructively by XPS 53,54,[59][60][61][62][63][64][65] . Since most NEXAFS endstations at modern synchrotron facilities include XPS spectrometers, the calculation of the overlayer thickness can be performed by acquiring XPS spectra in the same experimental chamber, thus avoiding any risk of changing the composition and thickness of the contamination layer upon transferring the sample to a dedicated XPS chamber.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Secondary ion mass spectroscopy (SIMS) and depth profiling by Auger electron spectroscopy and XPS could provide an accurate estimate of the overlayer thickness, but these methods are destructive. Alternately, the overlayer thickness can be determined non-destructively by XPS 53,54,[59][60][61][62][63][64][65] . Since most NEXAFS endstations at modern synchrotron facilities include XPS spectrometers, the calculation of the overlayer thickness can be performed by acquiring XPS spectra in the same experimental chamber, thus avoiding any risk of changing the composition and thickness of the contamination layer upon transferring the sample to a dedicated XPS chamber.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For electron yield NEXAFS spectroscopy of low-Z elements, the information depth (the specimen thickness measured normal to the surface from which a specified percentage of typically 95% of the detected signal originates) is usually less than 5 nm 1 . Unfortunately, the assumption of chemical and structural homogeneity does not hold in the vast majority of solid surfaces due to the presence of complex surface-bound species and layers, e.g., natural oxide and contamination layers 53,54 . This can lead to significant errors when analyzing elements that are simultaneously present in multiple layers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The oxygen 1s signal was composed of three peaks: the first at 530.3 ± 0.1 eV being assigned to oxygen in iron and zinc oxides [7,57,58], the main peak at 531.7 ± 0.1 eV to non-bridging oxygen (NBO) in polyphosphates and to oxygen bound to carbon [7,59,60] and the high-binding-energy peak at 533.4 eV to bridging oxygen (BO) in polyphosphates [60,61].…”
Section: Xps Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(BE = 710.5 eV, FWHM = 2.4 eV) and Fe 2? (BE = 709.0 eV, FWHM = 2.4 eV) with a Gaussian:Lorenzian ratio of 45:55 [50]. UV/Vis spectra were recorded at room temperature with a Perkin Elmer Lambda 20.…”
Section: Instruments and Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%